SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(X) ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 1994
or
( ) TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from Commission file number
to 1-3229
NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
DELAWARE 95-1055798
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification No.)
1840 Century Park East
Los Angeles, California 90067
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code (310) 553-6262
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Name of each exchange
Title of each class on which registered
Common Stock, $1 par value New York Stock Exchange
Pacific Stock Exchange
Securities Registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or such shorter period that
the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes x No
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to
Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be
contained, to the best of Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy
or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this
Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
As of March 10, 1995, 49,314,939 shares of Common Stock were
outstanding, and the aggregate market value of the Common Stock (based
upon the closing price of the stock on the New York Stock Exchange) of
the Registrant held by nonaffiliates was approximately $2,300 million.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Proxy Statement for the 1995 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders. Part III
NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION
PART I
Item 1. Business
Northrop Corporation was incorporated in Delaware in 1985.
Effective May 18, 1994 Northrop Corporation was renamed Northrop
Grumman Corporation. Northrop Grumman is an advanced technology
company operating in the aerospace industry. The company designs,
develops and manufactures aircraft, aircraft subassemblies and
electronic systems for military and commercial use and designs and
develops, operates and supports computer systems for scientific and
management information.
Additional information required by this Item is contained in Part
II Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION
Item 2. Properties
The major locations, general status of the company's interest in
the property and identity of the industry segments which use the
property described, are indicated in the following table.
Location Property Interest
Anaheim, California(1)(5)(a)(b)(e) Owned
Arlington, Virginia(5)(a) Leased
Benton Township, Pennsylvania (2)(b) Leased
* Bethpage, New York (1)(2)(3)(5)(a)(b)(c)(d) Owned and leased
Bridgeport, West Virginia (2)(b) Owned
Calverton, New York (1)(2)(a)(b)(c) Owned and leased
Carson, California(1)(c) Leased
Compton, California(1)(b)(c) Leased
Commerce, California(1)(c) Leased
Dallas, Texas (1)(a)(b) Owned and leased
Edwards Air Force Base, California(1) Leased
Elk Grove, Illinois(2)(a)(b)(c)(d) Leased
El Segundo, California(1)(4)(a)(b)(c)(d) Owned and leased
Fairborn, Ohio (3)(a)(c) Leased
Gardena, California(1)(2)(a)(b)(c) Owned and leased
Glen Arm, Maryland (1)(b) Owned
Grand Prairie, Texas (1)(a)(b)(c)(d) Owned and leased
Great River, New York (2)(a)(b) Owned
Hawthorne, California(1)(2)(4)(5)(a)(b)(c)(d) Owned and leased
* Hicksville, New York (1)(2)(a)(c)(d) Owned
Holtsville, New York (5)(a) Owned
Hondo, Texas(1)(e) Leased
Houston, Texas (3)(a) Leased
Huntington Station, New York (2)(a) Leased
Irvine, California (2)(d) Leased
Kent, Washington(1)(c) Leased
Lake Charles, Louisiana (1)(a)(b)(c) Leased
Lawton, Oklahoma (3)(a) Owned and leased
Lexington, Maine (1)(a)(c) Owned and leased
Los Angeles, California(1)(5)(a)(b)(c)(d) Leased
Mayfield, Pennsylvania (1)(b) Owned and leased
Melbourne, Florida (2)(a)(b) Owned and leased
Milledgeville, Georgia (1)(b)(c) Owned and leased
Montebello, California(1)(c) Leased
Montgomery, Pennsylvania (1)(b) Owned
Newbury Park, California(5)(a)(b)(c)(d) Owned
New Town, North Dakota(2)(a)(b)(c) Owned and leased
Norwood, Massachusetts(2)(a)(b)(c)(d) Owned and leased
Palmdale, California(1)(a)(b)(c)(d)(e) Owned and leased
Perry, Georgia(1)(4)(a)(b)(c) Owned
Pico Rivera, California(1)(3)(a)(b)(c)(d) Owned and leased
Rolling Hills Estates, California(5)(a)(d) Owned
Rolling Meadows, Illinois(2)(a)(b)(c)(d) Owned and leased
Sherman, Texas (1)(b) Owned
St. Augustine, Florida (1)(a)(b)(c) Owned and leased
Stuart, Florida (1)(b)(c) Owned and leased
Sturgis, Michigan (1)(a)(b)(c) Owned and leased
Titusville, Florida (3)(a) Leased
Torrance, California(1)(a)(b)(c) Owned and leased
Vinton, Virginia (1)(b) Owned
Warner Robins, Georgia(2)(a)(b) Owned
Warren, Michigan(1)(3)(a)(b)(c)(d) Leased
Woodbury, New York (3)(5)(a) Leased
__________
* Certain portions of the properties at each of these locations are
leased or subleased to others. The company believes that in the
aggregate the property covered by such leases or subleased to others
is not material compared to the property actually utilized by the
company in its business.
NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION
Following each described property are numbers indicating the
industry segments utilizing the property:
(1) Military and Commercial Aircraft
(2) Electronics and Systems Integration
(3) Data Systems and Other Services
(4) Missiles and Unmanned Vehicle Systems
(5) General Corporate Asset
Following each described property are letters indicating the
types of facilities located at each location:
(a) office
(b) manufacturing
(c) warehouse
(d) research and testing
(e) other
Government-owned facilities used or administered by the company
consist of 9.4 million square feet at various locations across the
United States.
The company believes its properties are well-maintained and in
good operating condition. Under present business conditions and the
company's volume of business, productive capacity is currently in
excess of requirements.
NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
False Claims Act Litigation
On June 9, 1987, a Complaint, entitled U.S. ex rel, David Peterson
and Jeff Kroll v. Northrop Corporation, was filed in the U.S. District
Court for the Central District of California alleging violations by the
company of the False Claims Act in connection with the operation of
petty cash funds, inspection, testing, and pricing for the MX
Peacekeeper Missile program. On September 1, 1989, the government
intervened and reduced the scope of the lawsuit by filing an amended
complaint. The amended complaint does not completely specify the total
amount being sought but, rather, seeks damages in excess of $1.2
million. On May 7, 1990, the Court ruled that the original plaintiffs
may proceed with portions of the lawsuit that the government declined
to include in the amended complaint. The court recently granted
summary judgment for the company on the government's allegations
related to petty cash, integrated test stations, extended work week and
experimental change orders. Trial on the remaining allegations could
occur in late 1995.
The company has been named a defendant in a lawsuit filed in the
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, entitled
Janssen v. Northrop, pursuant to the False Claims Act relating to the
company's pricing of subassemblies for the F/A-18 Hornet Jet. On
April 9, 1990, the U.S. Department of Justice intervened in the lawsuit
and filed an amended complaint. The amended complaint, which seeks
unspecified damages and penalties, alleges common law fraud, unjust
enrichment, and mistake of fact in connection with purported false
statements regarding labor hours, cost of materials and total dollar
costs that were required for Northrop to manufacture F/A-18 Hornet Jet
subassemblies. In May 1992, the U.S. Government filed an additional
complaint containing allegations substantially identical to those
contained in the April 9, 1990 amended complaint. This complaint seeks
damages relating to foreign military sales of the F/A-18 Hornet Jet.
The parties have agreed to submit this matter to binding arbitration.
In addition, the company is a party to a number of civil actions
brought by private parties alleging violation of the False Claims Act
in which the government has declined to intervene. These actions,
which have been previously reported, relate to the MX Peacekeeper
Missile, the Air Launched Cruise Missile and the Advanced Technology
Bomber (B-2) programs. In a number of these actions, plaintiffs also
allege employment related claims including claims of wrongful
termination. Damages sought include claims for compensatory and
punitive damages. A number of these civil actions were initially
reported when it was unclear what position, if any, the government
would take in the litigation. In light of the government's decision
not to intervene or otherwise pursue the litigation, as well as the amounts
involved, the cases will not be individually reported. Further, the
company learns from time to time that it has been named as a defendant
in lawsuits which are filed under seal pursuant to the False Claims
Act. Since these matters remain under seal, the company does not
possess sufficient information to accurately report on the particular
allegations.
Walsh, et al. v. Northrop Grumman Corporation
In November, 1994, a class action complaint was filed against Northrop
Grumman Corporation, Grumman Corporation, Renso Caporali, Howard J.
Dunn, Jr., Robert Denien and Robert E. Foster in the U.S. District
Court for the Eastern District of New York, Case No. CV 94-5105 (Platt
C.J.). The individual plaintiffs purport to represent a class of
Grumman Corporation employees who directly or beneficially owned
Grumman stock and who were eligible to participate in Grumman's
Severance Plan prior to the merger with Northrop. A first amended
complaint was filed on November 29 alleging that Grumman Corporation's
March 8 and April 4, 1994 Form 14D-9 filings with the Securities and
Exchange Commission incorporated a statement concerning the Grumman
Severance Plan which violated Sections 10(b), and 14 (e) of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, and Rule 10b-5. The complaint
also contains a cause of action for equitable estoppel based upon the
same statement and plaintiffs' alleged reliance thereon. The complaint
also alleges that the trustees of Grumman's Investment Plan violated
their fiduciary obligations by voting the Plan's shares in favor of the
merger without consulting the class members. The complaint seeks an
order enjoining defendants from amending or discontinuing the Severance
Plan for a period of thirty (30) months from the date of the merger and
an order mandating that defendants permit class members who have
accepted voluntary termination with severance pay to rescind their
elections. On December 8, 1994, the court denied plaintiffs'
application for a preliminary injunction but declined to dismiss the
action. Plaintiffs filed a motion to amend their complaint to add a
claim for damages based on post-acquisition changes to the Grumman
pension plan. The hearing on the motion to amend and for class
certification is scheduled for April 7, 1995. Absent dispositive
motions, this matter will proceed to trial in late 1995 or early 1996.
The defendants intend to vigorously defend this litigation and the
Company does not expect this matter to have a material adverse effect
on its financial condition.
GENERAL
The company, as a government contractor, is from time to time
subject to U.S. Government investigations relating to its operations.
Government contractors that are found to have violated the False Claims
Act, or are indicted or convicted for violations of other Federal laws,
or are considered not to be responsible contractors may be suspended or
debarred from government contracting for some period of time. Such
convictions could also result in fines. Given the company's dependence
on government contracting, suspension or debarment could have a
material adverse effect on the company.
NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION
Executive Officers of the Registrant
The following individuals were the elected officers of the
company as of February 16, 1995:
Business
Experience
Name Age Office Held Since Last Five Years
Kent Kresa 56 Chairman, President 1990 President and Chief
and CEO Executive Officer;
Prior to September
1990, President and
COO.
Herbert W. Anderson 55 Corporate Vice 1995 Vice President and Deputy
President and General Manager, Data
General Manager, Systems and Services
Data Systems & Division; Prior to 1994,
Services Division Vice President and Center
General Manager of Northrop
Information Services
Center; Prior to 1990,
Vice President Information
Resource Management, B-2
Program
Ralph D. Crosby, Jr. 47 Corporate Vice 1994 Vice President Business and
President and Advanced Systems
General Manager, Development at B-2
B-2 Division Division; Prior
to 1992, Vice President
Business Development and
Administration; Prior to
1991, Vice President and
Manager of Northrop
Washington Office
Marvin Elkin 58 Corporate Vice 1994 Corporate Vice
President President and Administration
Chief Human and Services; prior to
Resources and 1991 Vice President,
Administrative Materiel and Services
Officer
Sheila M. Gibbons 63 Corporate Vice 1992 Vice President and
President and Secretary
Secretary
Nelson F. Gibbs 57 Corporate Vice 1992 Vice President and
President and Controller; Prior
Controller to 1991, Partner,
Deloitte & Touche LLP
John E. Harrison 59 Corporate Vice 1995 Senior Vice President
President and and General Manager,
General Manager, Electronics Programs,
Electronics and Aerospace and Electronics
Systems Integration Group; Prior to
Division 1992, President,
Electronics Division,
Grumman Corporation
Robert W. Helm 43 Corporate Vice 1994 Vice President,
President, Legislative Affairs
Government Relations
Charles L. Jones, Jr.53 Corporate Vice 1992 Vice President, Quality
President, Operations; Prior to
Quality Operations 1991 Vice President
and Manager Operations,
Electronics Division; Prior
to 1990, Vice President and
Manager, Product Assurance
and Productivity
Richard R. Molleur 62 Corporate Vice 1991 Senior Vice President
President and and General Counsel;
General Counsel Prior to 1991, Partner,
Winston & Strawn
Albert F. Myers 49 Corporate Vice 1994 Vice President, Business
President Strategy; Prior to 1992,
and Treasurer Vice President, Test
Operations at B-2 Division
James G. Roche 55 Corporate Vice 1993 Corporate Vice President
President and Advanced Development and
Chief Advanced Planning Officer; Prior to
Development and 1992, Vice President,
Planning and Public Advanced Development and
Affairs Officer Planning; Prior to 1991
Vice President and Special
Assistant to the Chairman,
President and CEO.
Wallace G. Solberg 63 Corporate Vice 1994 Corporate Vice President
President and General
and General Manager, Manager-Aircraft Division;
Military Aircraft Prior to 1991, Vice
Division President and General
Manager, Electronics
Systems Division; Prior to
1990, Vice President and
General Manager, Defense
Systems Division.
Richard B. Waugh, Jr. 51 Corporate Vice 1993 Vice President, Taxes,
President and Risk Management and
Chief Financial Business Analysis
Officer
Max T. Weiss 72 Corporate Vice 1995 Corporate Vice President
President and General Manager
and Deputy General Electronics Systems
Manager, Electronics Division; Prior to
and Systems Integration December 1991, Vice
Division President - General
Technology and Advanced
Development; Prior to
July 1991, Vice President -
Technology; Prior to 1990,
Vice President-Technical,
Electronics Systems Group
Gordon L. Williams 62 Corporate Vice 1994 President & CEO, Vought
President Aircraft Company; Prior
and General Manager, to 1992, President,
Commercial Aircraft Aircraft Division,
Division LTV Aerospace & Defense
NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
No information is required in response to this Item.
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity and Related Stockholder
Matters
The information required by this Item is contained in Part II,
Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
The information required by this Item is contained in Part II,
Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations
Business Conditions
Northrop Grumman's industry segments - military and commercial
aircraft, electronics and systems integration, data systems and other
services, and missiles and unmanned vehicle systems (MUVS) - are each a
factor in the broadly defined aerospace industry. While Northrop
Grumman is subject to the usual vagaries of the marketplace, it is also
affected by the unique characteristics of the aerospace industry and by
certain elements peculiar to its own business mix.
In the second quarter of 1994 the company purchased the
outstanding common stock of Grumman Corporation (Grumman) for $2.1
billion. Northrop Corporation was renamed Northrop Grumman Corporation
effective May 18, 1994. In August 1994 the company purchased the
remaining 51 percent interest in Vought Aircraft Company (Vought) for
$130 million. The company had purchased a 49 percent interest in
Vought in 1992. As a result of these acquisitions the company
reorganized, effective January 1, 1995, into five operating divisions -
B-2 Division, Military Aircraft Division, Commercial Aircraft Division,
Electronics and Systems Integration Division and the Data Systems and
Services Division.
Northrop Grumman is one of about a dozen major companies in the
industry that compete for the relatively small number of large, long-
term programs that characterize both the defense and commercial
segments of the aerospace business. It is common in the aerospace
industry for work on major programs to be shared between a number of
companies. A company competing to be a prime contractor can turn out
to be a subcontractor. It is not uncommon to compete with customers,
and to simultaneously be both a supplier to and customer of a given
competitor. Boeing, Lockheed Martin and McDonnell Douglas are the
largest companies in the aerospace industry at this time. Northrop
Grumman also competes against many other companies for a relatively
large number of smaller programs, notably in the electronics areas.
Competition is intense, yet the nature of major aerospace programs,
conducted under binding contracts, allows companies that perform well
to benefit from a level of program continuity unknown in many
industries. Thus, intense competition and long operating cycles are
both characteristic of the industry's - and Northrop Grumman's -
business.
The B-2 bomber, for which the company is the prime contractor, is
Northrop Grumman's largest program. The B-2 Division is responsible
for final assembly of the B-2's airframe and systems integration (in
Palmdale, California), and the manufacture of the fuselage and parts of
the B-2's navigation and electronic warfare/situation awareness system.
Major subcontractors include Boeing, which makes the aft center
section, outboard wing sections, landing gear and fuel system, and GM
Hughes, which produces the radar systems. The Air Force currently
plans to operate two B-2 bomber squadrons of eight aircraft each with
an additional four aircraft available to fill in for those in depot for
periodic maintenance.
The company's Military Aircraft Division (MAD), headquartered in
Hawthorne, California, is the principal subcontractor on the McDonnell
Douglas F/A-18 program. The F/A-18 is a fighter/ground-attack aircraft
that can carry either one or two crew members. It is principally
deployed by the U.S. Navy on aircraft carriers, but several other
nations have purchased the aircraft and use it as a land-based combat
aircraft. The company builds approximately 40 percent of the aircraft
including the center and aft fuselage sections and vertical tails. Of
the versions of the F/A-18 currently in production, the C is a single-
seat combat aircraft that was first delivered to the Navy in 1987 and
the D is a two-seat version principally used for training. The F/A-
18E/F is an improved version of the F/A-18C/D under development for the
U.S. Navy as its next generation multi-mission aircraft.
NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION
MAD also produces aerial targets, principally the BQM-74/Chuker.
The BQM-74 series has been in production since the 1960s. It is used
by the Navy for air defense training, gunnery practice and weapon
system evaluation. The company builds the airframe and the electronics
that are used to guide the drone with the drone's engine being produced
by Williams International.
The Commercial Aircraft Division (CAD) supplies portions of the
Boeing 747, 757, 767 and 777 jetliners, the Gulfstream IV and V
business jets, and the McDonnell Douglas C-17. Northrop Grumman has
been a principal airframe subcontractor for the Boeing 747 jetliner
since the program began in 1966. The company produces the fuselage and
aft body section for the 747 as well as cargo and passenger doors, the
vertical and horizontal body stabilizers, floor beams and smaller
structural components. The majority of this work is performed at CAD's
primary production sites in Hawthorne, California; Grand Prairie,
Texas; Stuart, Florida; and Perry, Georgia. CAD manufactures engine
nacelles for the Gulfstream IV and other business jets and recently
initiated production of the wings for Gulfstream's newest business jet,
the Gulfstream V. CAD also produces the tail section, engine nacelles
and control surfaces for the McDonnell Douglas C-17 program, the U.S.
Air Force's most advanced airlifter, at various locations. The work
performed on the Gulfstream IV and V, 757, 767, 777 and some of the
components of the 747 and the C-17 were added as a result of the
Grumman and Vought acquisitions.
The Northrop Grumman designed and built all-weather E-2C Hawkeye
Airborne Early Warning Command and Control aircraft has been in active
service with the U.S. Navy since 1973 and is also employed by the air
forces of five other nations. The E-2C is produced by the company's
Electronics and Systems Integration Division (ESID).
ECM denotes electronic countermeasures equipment manufactured by
the ESID - Rolling Meadows Site. The largest program in this business
area is the AN/ALQ-135, which is an internally mounted radar jammer
deployed on F-15 fighter aircraft as part of that aircraft's Tactical
Electronic Warfare System. The AN/ALQ-162 Shadowbox is a jammer built
specifically to counter continuous wave radars. The AN/ALQ-162 has
been installed on the AV-8B and certain foreign F/A-18 aircraft. It is
also being deployed on U.S. Army helicopters and special mission
aircraft and it has been sold to the air forces of three other nations.
ESID also produces the E-8 Joint Surveillance Target Attack Radar
System (Joint STARS). Joint STARS detects, locates, classifies, tracks
and targets potentially hostile ground movement in all weather. It is
designed to operate around the clock, in constant communication through
secure data links with air force command posts, army mobile ground
stations or centers of military analysis far from the point of
conflict. The Joint STARS platform is a remanufactured Boeing 707-300
airframe. The 707 is remanufactured at Northrop Grumman's Lake
Charles, Louisiana site. Final installation of electronics and testing
are performed at the ESID - Integration and Test Facility in Melbourne,
Florida.
The ESID-Hawthorne Site, as the prime contractor to the U.S. Army,
is developing a "brilliant" anti-armor submunition, designated as BAT,
with production scheduled to commence in 1998. BAT is a three foot
long, 44 pound, wide-area-attack submunition that will be used to
disable and destroy armored vehicles and trucks. BATs are meant to be
carried and dispensed by a larger missile. BATs are designed to be
ejected over an armored vehicle column or attacking formation. Each
BAT has an infrared sensor that can home in on the heat generated by a
vehicle's engine, and an acoustic sensor that can home in on the noise
created by the tank or truck's engine.
NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION
Northrop Grumman's Data Systems and Services Division (DSSD)
designs, develops, operates and supports computer systems for
scientific and management information. Services provided include
systems integration, systems service, information conversion and
training for federal, state and local governments and private industry.
DSSD also provides military base support functions and aircraft
maintenance at a number of U.S. Government facilities.
Tables of contract acquisitions, sales and funded order backlog by
major program follow and complement industry segment data. B-2, F/A-
18, Boeing Jetliners (the 747, 757, 767 and 777) and C-17 are currently
the major programs of the military and commercial aircraft industry
segment. E-2C Hawkeye, ECM, E-8 Joint STARS and BAT are included in the
electronics and systems integration industry segment. The DSSD is the
major component of the data systems and other services industry
segment. The Tri-Service Standoff Attack Missile (TSSAM), the segment's
principal program, and aerial targets are included in the company's
MUVS industry segment. The "all other" category includes the balance
of the company's numerous other contracts, classified and unclassified.
NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION
Results Of Operations By Industry Segment And Major Customer
Year ended December 31, $ in millions 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990
Revenue:
Military and Commercial Aircraft
United States Government $3,896 $3,570 $3,864 $3,728 $3,629
Other customers 687 543 560 553 498
Intersegment sales 52 1 1 1
Other income 5 1 1 6
4,640 4,115 4,426 4,282 4,133
Electronics and Systems Integration
United States Government 1,135 582 677 738 760
Other customers 306 15 9 18 31
Intersegment sales 106 114 120 118 134
Other income(deductions) (1) 1 (11) 1
1,546 711 807 863 926
Data Systems and Other Services
United States Government 309 79 88 95 117
Other customers 30
Intersegment sales 22 1
Other deductions (1)
361 79 87 95 118
Missiles and Unmanned Vehicle Systems
United States Government 332 250 329 541 423
Other customers 16 24 23 21 32
Other income 2 2 1 1 1
350 276 353 563 456
Intersegment eliminations (180) (115) (121) (119) (135)
Total revenue $6,717 $5,066 $5,552 $5,684 $5,498
Operating Profit(Loss)
Military and Commercial Aircraft $ 463 $ 387 $ 357 $ 384 $ 262
Electronics and Systems Integration 122 56 63 54 56
Data Systems and Other Services 14 4 3 4 5
Missiles and Unmanned Vehicle Systems (18) (185) (135) 33 24
Total operating profit 581 262 288 475 347
Adjustments to reconcile
operating profit to operating margin:
Other (income)deductions included above (6) (3) (2) 10 (8)
State and local income taxes (28) (18) (12) (30) (14)
General corporate expenses (113) (96) (105) (107) (89)
Retiree benefit cost included in
contract costs 80 9 7 22 33
Retiree benefit income(cost) (33) 39 42 (24) 24
Special termination benefits (282)
Operating margin $ 199 $ 193 $ 218 $ 346 $ 293
NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION
Year ended December 31, $ in millions 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990
Contract Acquisitions
Military and Commercial Aircraft $ 8,122 $ 3,764 $ 3,072 $ 6,297 $ 5,492
Electronics and Systems Integration 3,121 616 568 722 612
Data Systems and Other Services 526 75 89 83 110
Missiles and Unmanned Vehicle Systems 196 352 435 450 386
Total acquisitions $11,965 $ 4,807 $ 4,164 $ 7,552 $ 6,600
Funded Order Backlog
Military and Commercial Aircraft $ 9,189 $ 5,650 $ 5,999 $ 7,351 $ 5,335
Electronics and Systems Integration 2,379 699 680 798 832
Data Systems and Other Services 230 43 47 46 58
Missiles and Unmanned Vehicle Systems 375 527 449 366 478
Total backlog $12,173 $ 6,919 $ 7,175 $ 8,561 $ 6,703
Identifiable Assets
Military and Commercial Aircraft $ 2,974 $ 1,793 $ 1,849 $ 1,913 $ 2,034
Electronics and Systems Integration 1,754 325 360 445 479
Data Systems and Other Services 485 104 115 109 30
Missiles and Unmanned Vehicle Systems 190 175 272 280 278
Operating assets 5,403 2,397 2,596 2,747 2,821
General corporate 644 542 566 381 273
Total assets $ 6,047 $ 2,939 $ 3,162 $ 3,128 $ 3,094
Capital Expenditures
Military and Commercial Aircraft $ 75 $ 71 $ 46 $ 57 $ 62
Electronics and Systems Integration 33 30 34 22 34
Data Systems and Other Services 14 25 34 31 2
Missiles and Unmanned Vehicle Systems 11 8 7 7 20
General corporate 1 1 2 1 3
Total expenditures $ 134 $ 135 $ 123 $ 118 $ 121
Depreciation and Amortization
Military and Commercial Aircraft $ 155 $ 142 $ 85 $ 96 $ 125
Electronics and Systems Integration 76 40 39 42 47
Data Systems and Other Services 27 24 25 21 3
Missiles and Unmanned Vehicle Systems 11 7 10 10 9
General Corporate 1 1 2 3
Total depreciation and amortization $ 269 $ 214 $ 160 $ 171 $ 187
NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION
Individual companies prosper in the competitive aerospace/defense
environment according to their ability to develop and market innovative
products. They must also have the ability to provide the people,
facilities, equipment and financial capacity needed to deliver those
products with maximum efficiency. It is necessary to maintain, as the
company has, sources for raw materials, fabricated parts, electronic
components and major subassemblies. In this manufacturing and systems
integration environment, effective oversight of subcontractors and
suppliers is as vital to success as managing internal operations.
Northrop Grumman's operating policies are designed to enhance these
capabilities. The company also believes that it maintains good
relations with its employees, a small number of whom are covered by
collective bargaining agreements.
U.S. Government programs in which Northrop Grumman either
participates, or strives to participate, must compete with other
programs for consideration during our nation's budget formulation and
appropriation processes. As a consequence of the end of the Cold War
and pressure to reduce the federal budget deficit, the U.S. defense
budget is not expected to increase substantially in the near term.
Budget decisions made in this environment will have long-term
consequences for the size and structure of Northrop Grumman and the
entire defense industry. An important factor in determining Northrop
Grumman's ability to successfully compete for future contracts will be
its cost structure vis-a-vis other bidders.
Given these conditions, it is difficult to predict the amount and
rate of decline in defense outlays. Although the ultimate size of
future defense budgets remains uncertain, the defense needs of the
nation are expected to provide a substantial research and development
(R&D) and procurement business level for the company to pursue in the
future.
Northrop Grumman has historically concentrated much of its efforts
in such high technology areas as stealth, airborne surveillance, battle
management, precision weapons and systems integration. Even though a
high priority has been assigned by the Department of Defense to our
major programs, there remains the possibility that one or more of them
may be reduced, stretched or terminated.
In the commercial aircraft market, many airlines have recently
deferred deliveries and purchases of new aircraft. This has caused The
Boeing Company to announce reductions in its scheduled production of
various jetliners, including the 747. As a result, Northrop Grumman's
subcontract workload for the 747, the company's largest commercial
program, was stretched out, beginning in late 1993, with deliveries
declining 42 percent in 1994, with a further 22 percent decline
expected in 1995. Although business conditions in the commercial
aircraft industry currently remain depressed, the company with
participation on the various Boeing jetliners, Gulfstream and other
business jet programs, is optimistic about the longer-term prospects
for its commercial aircraft structures business.
NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION
Northrop Grumman pursues new business opportunities when justified
by acceptable financial returns and technological risks. The company
examines opportunities to acquire or invest in new businesses and
technologies to strengthen its traditional business areas. Northrop
Grumman also is exploring new directions for marketing and capitalizing
on its technologies and skills by entering into joint ventures,
partnerships or associations with other companies.
Northrop Grumman, as well as many other companies in the defense
industry, suffered the effects of the Department of Defense's practice
in the 1980s of structuring new, high-risk research and development
contracts, such as TSSAM, as fixed-price or capped cost-reimbursement
type contracts. Although Northrop Grumman has stopped accepting these
types of contracts, it has experienced financial losses on TSSAM and
other similar programs acquired under them in the past. The company
received a termination for convenience notice on the TSSAM program in
February 1995. In the event of termination for convenience contractors
are normally protected by provisions covering reimbursement for all
costs incurred subsequent to termination. The company does not expect
that the TSSAM termination will have a material financial effect on the
company's financial position.
Prime contracts with various agencies of the U.S. Government and
subcontracts with other prime contractors are subject to a profusion of
procurement regulations, with noncompliance found by any one agency
possibly resulting in fines, penalties, debarment or suspension from
receiving additional contracts with all agencies. Given the company's
dependence on U. S. Government business, suspension or debarment could
have a material adverse affect on the company's future. Moreover,
these contracts may be terminated at the Government's convenience as
was done with the TSSAM program. While Northrop Grumman conducts most
of its business with the U.S. Government, principally the Department of
Defense, commercial sales still represent a significant portion of
total revenue.
Federal, state and local laws relating to the protection of the
environment affect the company's manufacturing operations. The
company has provided for the estimated cost to complete remediation
where it is probable that the company will incur such costs in the
future, including those for which it has been named a Potentially
Responsible Party (PRP) by the Environmental Protection Agency or
similarly designated by other environmental agencies. The company has
been designated a PRP under federal Superfund laws at eight hazardous
waste sites and under state Superfund laws at six sites. It is
difficult to estimate the timing and ultimate amount of environmental
cleanup costs to be incurred in the future due to the uncertainties
regarding the extent of the required cleanup and the status of the law,
regulations and their interpretations. Nonetheless, to assess the
potential impact on the company's financial statements, management
estimates the total reasonably possible remediation costs that could be
incurred by the company. Such estimates take into consideration the
professional judgment of the company's environmental engineers and,
when necessary, consultation with outside environmental specialists.
In most instances, only a range of reasonably possible costs can be
estimated. The top end of the range is reflected as the total estimate
of reasonably possible costs; however, in the determination of accruals
the most probable amount is used when determinable and the minimum is
used when no single amount is more probable. The company records
accruals for environmental cleanup costs in the accounting period in
which the company's responsibility is established and the costs can be
reasonably estimated. Management estimates that at December 31, 1994,
the reasonably possible range of future costs for environmental
remediation, including Superfund sites, is $31 million to $53 million,
of which $39 million has been accrued. The amount accrued has not been
offset by potential recoveries from insurance carriers or other PRPs.
Should other PRPs not pay their allocable share of remediation costs
the company may have to incur costs in addition to those already
estimated and accrued. In 1993 the company was awarded a judgment of
$6.7 million against its insurance carrier with respect to costs
associated with the ESID-Norwood operation Plant 2 remediation. This
award is currently on appeal and is not reflected in the company's
financial statements. The company is making the necessary investments
to comply with environmental laws; however, the amounts, while not
insignificant, are not considered material to the company's financial
position or results of its operations.
Measures of Volume
Contract acquisitions tend to fluctuate and are determined by the size
and timing of new and add-on orders. The effects of multi-year orders
and/or funding can be seen in the highs and lows shown in the following
table. The funded order backlog of Grumman and Vought on the date the
companies were acquired are reflected as acquisitions in 1994. The
757, 767, 777 (included in Boeing Jetliners category), E-2, E-8 Joint
STARS, and C-17 programs were acquired as part of Grumman and Vought.
B-2 acquisitions in 1994 include $2.4 billion of funding to
complete the last five production aircraft, incremental funding for
ongoing development work, spares and other customer support for the 20
operational aircraft program. The company still stands to gain future
new post-production business, such as airframe depot maintenance,
repair of components, operational software changes and product
improvement modifications. The debate over the future of the B-2,
which is built in the nation's only active bomber producing facility,
is now taking place. Without future production orders the nation's
multi-billion dollar investment in this capability will be disassembled
and become retrievable only at a large additional cost.
Contract Acquisitions
$ in millions 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990
B-2 $ 3,646 $ 2,632 $ 2,235 $ 4,794 $ 3,749
F/A-18C/D 211 89 576 564 529
F/A-18E/F 249 743 131 10
Boeing Jetliners 1,177 242 76 870 950
E-2 1,136
ECM 323 445 361 431 395
E-8 Joint STARS 1,151
Data Systems and Other Services 526 75 89 83 110
TSSAM 157 248 349 369 277
C-17 434
BAT 88 90 147 82 51
All other 2,867 243 200 349 539
$11,965 $ 4,807 $ 4,164 $ 7,552 $ 6,600
NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION
In 1994, $250 million of funding was received toward the
development of the next generation F/A-18, the E/F version. This
development program alone has an estimated sales value of $1.5 billion
to Northrop Grumman. Acquisitions in 1994 and 1993 included long-lead
funding received from the McDonnell Douglas Corporation for new F/A-
18C/D shipsets. In 1992, orders for 88 F/A-18C/D shipsets were
received. In 1991, 70 F/A-18C/D shipsets were ordered, compared with
84 in 1990.
The Boeing Company ordered one hundred 747 shipsets in each of the
years 1991 and 1990. In 1993, additional contract value was received
for, among other things, extending the delivery schedule of those
shipsets into 1996.
The balance of Grumman and Vought funded order backlog at the
dates of acquisition, for those programs not listed in the table, is
included in the "all other" category and accounts for the major
increase over 1993 and prior years.
Year-to-year sales vary less than contract acquisitions and
reflect performance under new and ongoing contracts. The 1994 results
of operations include Grumman and Vought since the acquisitions in
April and August 1994, respectively. Comparative results for 1993 and
prior do not include Grumman and Vought data.
Sales for 1994 were the highest in the company's history and were
33 percent higher than in 1993. Without the Grumman and Vought
acquisitions sales would have declined 10 percent from the 1993 level.
Net Sales
$ in millions 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990
B-2 $2,392 $2,881 $3,212 $3,100 $2,744
F/A-18C/D 309 362 492 562 597
F/A-18E/F 508 279 118 10
Boeing Jetliners 483 531 549 540 483
E-2 409
ECM 357 372 378 415 425
E-8 Joint STARS 345
Data Systems and Other Services 339 79 88 95 117
TSSAM 276 179 265 390 343
C-17 121
BAT 88 100 135 71 55
All other 1,084 280 313 511 726
$6,711 $5,063 $5,550 $5,694 $5,490
NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION
The decreasing trend in the B-2 revenues from both engineering and
manufacturing development (EMD) and production work continued in 1994.
The level of EMD effort, included in amounts reported as customer-
sponsored R&D, constituted 26 percent of the total B-2 revenue, down
from 28 percent in 1993 and 34 percent in 1992. Current planning data
indicate that the level of overall B-2 revenue will decline roughly 20
percent per year for the remainder of the decade.
Sales declined again in 1994 under the F/A-18C/D program with the
delivery of 42 shipsets, down from the 52 delivered in 1993. In 1992,
the company delivered 75 shipsets, compared with 80 in 1991, and 94 in
1990. In 1995 and 1996, the company plans to deliver 60 and 68 F/A-
18C/D shipsets respectively. F/A-18E/F revenue is expected to exceed
$400 million again in 1995 with the delivery of the first shipset
scheduled for the second quarter. A total of 7 F/A-18E/F shipsets are
planned for delivery in 1995 under the EMD contract.
Deliveries of 747 center fuselages were 31 in 1994, 54 in 1993, 60
in 1992, 62 in 1991, and 56 in 1990. Twenty-four fuselages are
expected to be delivered in 1995 with no significant changes
anticipated in the near future.
The electronics and systems integration segment revenues more than
doubled in 1994 with the increase coming from the acquisition of
Grumman more than offsetting the decrease from lower BAT development
revenue and lower ECM sales. Reduced electronics segment revenues in
1993 stemmed from lower BAT development revenue, lower MX Peacekeeper
sales and lower sales in the sensor product area. In both 1993 and
1992 fewer deliveries of missile components by the ESID-Norwood
operation were made versus the respective previous year. Overall
electronics and systems integration segment sales are expected to
increase by more than 20 percent in 1995 with the inclusion of a full
year of sales from the programs added by the Grumman acquisition.
The year-end funded order backlog is the sum of the previous year-
end backlog plus the year's contract acquisitions minus the year's
sales. Backlog is converted into the following years' sales as costs
are incurred or deliveries are made. It is expected that approximately
50 percent of the 1994 year-end backlog will be converted into sales in
1995, which are currently expected to be about $6.7 billion.
NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION
Funded Order Backlog
$ in millions 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990
B-2 $ 5,175 $ 3,921 $ 4,170 $ 5,147 $ 3,453
F/A-18C/D 345 443 716 632 630
F/A-18E/F 220 477 13
Boeing Jetliners 1,417 723 1,012 1,485 1,155
E-2 727
ECM 506 540 467 484 468
E-8 Joint STARS 806
Data Systems and Other Services 230 43 47 46 58
TSSAM 248 367 298 214 235
C-17 313
BAT 20 20 30 18 7
All other 2,166 385 422 535 697
$12,173 $ 6,919 $ 7,175 $ 8,561 $ 6,703
Total U.S. Government orders, including those made on behalf of
foreign governments (FMS), comprised 80 percent of the backlog at the
end of 1994 compared with 89 percent at the end of 1993, 85 percent at
the end of 1992, and 82 percent at the end of both 1991 and 1990.
Total foreign customer orders, including FMS, accounted for 9 percent
of the backlog at the end of 1994 compared with 3 percent in 1993, 2
percent in 1992, 3 percent in 1991, and 4 percent in 1990. Domestic
commercial business remaining in backlog at the end of 1994 was 14
percent, 11 percent at the end of 1993, 14 percent at the end of 1992
and 17 percent for both 1991 and 1990.
Measures of Performance
The company's operating margin has improved in each of its two largest
and most mature industry segments military and commercial aircraft and
electronics and systems integration. These improvements stem from
overall improved operating margin rates in Northrop Grumman's
continuing programs as well as the addition of the Grumman and Vought
programs. Company-wide efforts to reduce costs, install tighter
business controls, improve cash management, dispose of excess assets
and more effectively utilizing productive assets are all goals aimed at
contributing to the future success of Northrop Grumman. This financial
report demonstrates the degree to which the accomplishment of these
goals is being achieved.
NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION
Operating profit in the military and commercial aircraft industry
segment increased to its highest level ever in 1994, exceeding the
previous high reached in 1993, as margin rates improved on the B-2 and
F/A-18 programs. The rate and amount of operating margin recorded on
the F/A-18E/F increased in 1994 due to an approximately one and one
half percent increase in the rate of operating margin being recorded on
the EMD contract, which was made during the fourth quarter. This
resulted from the continuing evaluation of the overall operating margin
to be earned on this phase of the program. The F/A-18 program
operating margin improved in 1994 and 1993 despite reduced F/A-18C/D
shipset deliveries in each of these years versus the previous year.
The B-2 operating margin improved in 1994 where the amount of
margin recorded on the four deliveries more than offset reduced
operating margin from lower production and EMD sales. Following the
award of the last increment of production funding for the B-2, the
company began recording future operating margin increases on all
production aircraft as these units are delivered and accepted by the
customer. At the time each unit is delivered an assessment will be
made of the status of the production contract so as to estimate the
amount of any probable additional margin available beyond that
previously recognized. That unit's proportionate share of any such
unrecognized remaining balance will then be recorded. In this fashion
it is believed that margin improvements will be recognized on a more
demonstrable basis. The current 15 production units are scheduled for
their initial delivery over a five year period, which began in December
1993. All but two units (four equivalent units for this purpose) will
be returned for scheduled retrofitting with final deliveries beginning
in 1997 and ending in 2000. It is anticipated that the total of 30
equivalent units will be delivered at a rate of from three to five per
year over the next six years.
Fewer deliveries and a reduction in the rate of operating margin
due to increased costs allocated, as a result of establishing a
separate commercial aircraft operating element, caused decreased
operating profit on the 747 program in 1994. The primary cause of
military and commercial aircraft segment operating profit being higher
in 1991 than 1992 was the one percentage point increase in the B-2 Low
Rate Initial Production (LRIP) contract margin rate made during the
fourth quarter of 1991 on sales recorded prior to that date ($40
million of margin). This 1991 margin rate adjustment followed
definitization of the LRIP contract late in the year and took into
account the company's production and assembly experience as of that
date. Setting aside the $40 million adjustment, the B-2 program
provided an increasing amount of operating margin in each of the last
four years as the mix of sales continues its shift from relatively
lower margin R&D work to higher margin production work.
Affecting the comparison of 1992 military and commercial aircraft
operating profit with that of 1991 were the slightly lower rates of
margin earned on fewer F/A-18C/D and 747 shipset deliveries. In
addition, a low rate of margin was recorded in 1992 on the F/A-18E/F as
this program was in its early phase of development.
Partially offsetting the B-2 margin improvement for 1991 was the
lower rate of margin earned on the reduced number of F/A-18 shipsets
delivered during 1991. A slightly lower rate of margin was earned on
higher 747 shipset deliveries generating an overall increase in the
amount of 747 margin. Affecting comparison of 1991 military and commercial
aircraft segment operating profit with that of the previous year is the
$66 million invested and written off on the ATF program during 1990. With
the completion of the DEM/VAL phase of ATF in 1990 the company discontinued
making any material amount of expenditures for company-sponsored R&D.
Operating profit in the electronics and systems integration
segment also reached a record level in 1994. This was due primarily to
the addition of Grumman's E-2, E-8 Joint STARS and various other
military electronics programs and an increased rate of margin recorded
in the company's electronic countermeasures business, which more than
offset the $8 million in provisions recorded by the ESID-Norwood
operation for unrecoverable costs incurred.
The 13 percent sales decline in the electronics and systems
integration segment for 1993 from the level achieved in 1992 was
accompanied by an 11 percent decline in operating profit. An increase
in ECM operating margin and the benefit of a $5 million reduced loss at
the ESID-Norwood operation offset lower margins in the sensor product
area and on the BAT program.
The amount and rate of operating profit earned by the electronics
and systems integration segment increased during 1992 despite the loss
incurred by ESID-Norwood. ESID-Norwood's operating loss declined $7
million from that of 1991. In 1992 the ESID-Norwood operation suffered
from the effects of a 24 percent sales decline coupled with a $6
million write-off of unrecoverable inventoried costs. Also influencing
the trend in the electronics and systems integration segment operating
profit has been the replacement of higher margin Peacekeeper production
revenue by lower margin BAT development revenue.
While the rate of operating profit for 1991 improved slightly for
the electronics and systems integration segment, the amount of profit
declined $2 million. The rate increase was largely achieved by the ECM
area where improved margins accompanied higher sales of the AN/ALQ-135
system developed for the F-15 fighter aircraft. Offsetting this
increase was the cost of settling various legal and product disputes,
principally for the ESID-Norwood operation. Of the aggregate of $31
million in provisions made during 1991 for these issues, $12 million is
reported in Other Deductions in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
The loss provision made during 1994 on the TSSAM development
contract was $20 million, and followed provisions aggregating $201
million in 1993 and a similar provision of $152 million in 1992. The
recording of the expected loss from the performance of this classified
long-term fixed-price R&D contract caused major losses in the MUVS
segment during four of the last six years. Most of these provisions
resulted from additional costs necessary to comply with contractual
requirements. Production delays caused increased amounts of sustaining
labor to be absorbed by the development phase of the program in which
the company has invested over $600 million. The ultimate loss on this
contract will depend on the company's negotiation of costs claims with
the U.S. Government in connection with the contract termination for
convenience notice received by the company in February 1995. The
company will seek to recoup its investment in plant and equipment made
for the production phase of the program from the government. As
previously indicated, the company does not expect the termination of
the program to have a material financial impact on the company.
NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION
After being profitable in each of the previous four years, the
company's traditional line of aerial targets incurred a $2 million
operating loss in 1994 resulting from $4 million in provisions for
unrecoverable inventories recorded in the fourth quarter. The overall
increase in MUVS operating profit in 1991 versus 1990 resulted from the
completion of the Tacit Rainbow missile program at less cost than had
previously been estimated.
Operating margin in 1994 was reduced by $282 million to record the
effect of an early retirement incentive program. Operating margin in
1994 also included $36 million of pension income compared with $71
million in 1993, $83 million in 1992 and $23 million in 1991. Also
contributing to the change from net retiree benefit income in 1993 to a
net retiree benefit cost in 1994 was 1994's increase in the cost of
providing retiree health care and life insurance benefits - $69 million
in 1994 versus $32 million in 1993, $41 million in 1992, and $47
million in 1991. A major contributor to the 1994 net retiree benefit
cost was the addition of the Grumman and Vought retiree plans.
The Financial Accounting Standards Board's (FASB) accounting
standard No. 106 - Employers' Accounting for Postretirement Benefits
Other Than Pensions - was adopted by the company in 1991. The
liability representing previously unrecognized costs of $145 million
for all years prior to 1991 was recorded as of January 1, 1991, with an
after-tax effect on earnings of $88 million or $1.86 per share. The
company's adoption in 1992 of the new FASB accounting standard No. 112
- - Employers' Accounting for Postemployment Benefits - had no material
effect on the company's financial position or operating results.
In 1994 the company recorded a $42 million pretax charge for the
planned disposal of excess real estate and other assets. This was a
result of the company's continuing efforts to reduce operating costs
and dispose of assets which have become excess due to changes in the
company's business strategy. This charge is reported in Other
Deductions in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
Interest expense increased $71 million in 1994 after declining in
each of the previous four years by $9 million in 1993, $33 million in
1992, $15 million in 1991, and $29 million in 1990. The increase in
1994 came primarily from the issuance of debt to finance the
acquisition of Grumman. Total debt at December 31, 1994 stood at $1.9
billion compared to $160 million at the end of 1993. Nearly all of the
interest expense reductions in the previous four years stemmed from
debt reduction which over this period totaled $960 million.
In 1991 the company adopted FASB standard No. 109 - Accounting for
Income Taxes - and recorded, as of January 1, 1991, a benefit of $21
million, or 43 cents per share. As described in the accounting policy
footnote to the financial statements, any future change in the tax rate
would result in the immediate recognition in current earnings of the
cumulative effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities.
NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION
The company's effective federal income tax rate was 46.2 percent
in 1994, 43.5 percent in 1993, 32.8 percent in 1992, and 3.2 percent in
1991. The change in the 1994 rate was caused by an increase in the
amount of expenses not deductible for income taxes, primarily the
amortization of goodwill. The rate for 1993 would have been 31.8
percent but for the effects of the retroactive application of The
Revenue Reconciliation Act of 1993. The one percentage point increase
in the federal statutory income tax rate, now 35 percent, required the
redetermination of December 31, 1992 deferred tax asset and liability
balances. This redetermination added $18 million to 1993's tax
provision thereby reducing earnings per share by 38 cents. During
1989, final regulations were issued concerning the research tax credit.
The company had taken a conservative approach in calculating its tax
provisions since 1981 pursuant to uncertain proposed regulations. An
exhaustive study was undertaken throughout the company to redetermine
qualifying expenditures in compliance with the final regulations so as
to recalculate prior years' tax credits and amend its tax returns as
appropriate. The benefit resulting from the conclusion of that study
was the $90 million in additional research credits recognized in the
determination of the 1991 effective tax rate of 3.2 percent.
Measures of Liquidity and Capital Resources
The improvement of the company's financial condition and liquidity,
which began in 1990, continued in 1994. Over the last five years
operating cash flows have averaged $400 million annually. The
$441 million of cash flow from operations in 1994 was an increase of
$61 million over 1993 which was a $96 million increase over that of
1992, while it had declined $325 million in 1992 from that of 1991.
Much of the increase in 1991's cash flow from operations resulted from
the company finalizing the B-2 LRIP contract, after it was about 50
percent complete, as well as follow-on contracts for 747 and F/A-18
work. To a great extent the pace of delivery of B-2 production
aircraft and the satisfactory completion of program milestones will
dictate the future level of any required additional capital resources.
Provisions for contract losses are one of the important elements
depicting the difference between Net Income and cash flows from
operating activities shown in the Reconciliation section of the
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
The trend and relationship of sales volume with accounts
receivable and inventoried cost balances, before and after the benefit
of progress payments, is a useful measure in assessing liquidity. In
1989 the company's net investment in these balances represented 32
percent of sales. It dropped to 27 percent at the end of 1993 before
rising to 33 percent at year-end 1994 with the acquisition of Grumman
and Vought. The largest recent reduction in gross accounts receivable
and inventoried cost balances occurred in 1991 as the result of the
final billing and collection of ATF contract balances, along with the
completion of a number of B-2 contract milestones during the year.
The following table is a condensed summary of the detailed cash
flow information contained in the Consolidated Statements of Cash
Flows.
NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION
Year ended December 31 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990
Cash came from
Customers 71% 99% 98% 100% 85%
Lenders 29% 1% 2% 11%
Buyers of assets 4%
100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Cash went to
Employees and suppliers of services
and materials 65% 89% 93% 88% 81%
Sellers of assets 18% 1%
Lenders 15% 8% 3% 9% 16%
Suppliers of facilities 1% 2% 2% 2% 2%
Shareholders 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%
100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
The above percentages of gross cash receipts and disbursements
portray the company's ability to repay the support that was received
from lenders, in 1990 and before, through improved collections from
customers. The increased cash received from lenders in 1994 resulted
from the acquisition of Grumman, which was financed mainly through new
borrowings. Other important indicators of short-term liquidity are the
trend in working capital, the current ratio, and the ratio of long-term
debt to shareholders' equity. This information is reported in the
table captioned Selected Financial Data.
In February of 1990 the company sold its headquarters complex in
Los Angeles and applied the net proceeds of $218 million toward
reducing its short-term debt. In October 1990 the company reduced its
former $750 million revolving credit agreement to $400 million and
converted that amount of short-term debt into long-term debt repayable
in 20 quarterly installments of $20 million. The company elected to
prepay larger amounts. Cash flow from operations during 1992 was
sufficient to enable the company to pay the four required installments
totaling $80 million as well as to prepay another $60 million of this
debt. In February of 1993 the last two installments totaling $40
million were prepaid and in November $210 million of notes due to
institutional investors were paid. During three months of 1993 it was
necessary to supplement cash provided by operations with short-term
borrowings. These borrowings peaked at $232 million and none were
outstanding at 1993's year end.
In connection with the financing of the Grumman acquisition the
company, in April 1994, replaced the $400-million credit agreement with
a new $2.8 billion Credit Agreement. The new facility provided for
$600 million, available on a revolving credit basis through March 1999
and a $2.2 billion term loan payable through March 1999. The Credit
Agreement was amended in May 1994 to increase the revolving credit line
to $800 million and reduce the term loan to $2 billion. In October
1994, the company issued $350 million of notes due in 2004 and $250
million of debentures due in 2024 pursuant to a public offering. The
net proceeds from the offering, along with other available funds, were
used to prepay $900 million in addition to paying the $100 million
September quarterly installment due under the term loan facility. In
December 1994, the company amended the Credit Agreement to provide for
the repayment of the remaining $1 billion balance of the term loan in
14 quarterly installments of $62.5 million plus interest beginning in
September 1995, with a final installment of $125 million due in March 1999.
Cash flow from operations during 1994 enabled the company to prepay the
$160 million of notes payable to institutional investors due in 1995 and
acquire, in the open market, $58 million of notes due in 1999, while paying
a net premium of $5 million for the early payments of these notes. The
charge for the premium is included in Other Deductions in the
Consolidated Statements of Income. Any future near-term borrowing
needs will be met through the use of short-term credit lines and the
company's $800 million revolving credit agreement.
To provide for long-term liquidity the company believes it could
obtain additional capital from such sources as: the public or private
capital markets, the further sale of assets, sale and leaseback of
operating assets, and leasing rather than purchasing new assets.
The cash improvement program underway throughout the company since
early 1989 has produced favorable results, with the expectation that
further efforts will result in minimizing, if not eliminating, the need
to incur additional borrowings during 1995. Cash generated from
operations is expected to be sufficient in 1995 to service debt,
finance capital expansion projects and continue paying dividends to the
shareholders. Noncontract R&D expenditures are expected to approximate
$145 million in 1995 compared with $121 million in 1994.
Capital expenditure commitments at December 31, 1994, were
approximately $115 million including $4 million for environmental
control and compliance purposes. The 1995 forecast of capital
expenditures is $190 million.
The company will continue to provide the productive capacity to
perform its existing contracts, dispose of assets no longer needed to
fulfill operational requirements, prepare for future contracts and
conduct R&D in the pursuit of developing opportunities. While these
expenditures tend to limit short-term liquidity, they are made with the
intention of improving the long-term growth and profitability of the
company.
Based on recent cash flow improvements, anticipated future
positive cash flows, and unused and available capital resources,
management believes that it is in a strong position to continue to
pursue its strategic options - acquiring one or more other businesses,
raising cash dividends, repurchasing outstanding common shares, or
making other investments to maximize the long-term return to our
shareholders.
NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION
Selected Financial Data
Year ended December 31, $ in millions, except per share
1994 1993 1992 1991 1990
Net sales to
United States Government $5,672 $4,481 $4,958 $5,102 $4,929
The Boeing Company 483 531 549 540 483
Other customers 556 51 43 52 78
Total net sales 6,711 5,063 5,550 5,694 5,490
Net income 35 96 121 201 210
Earnings per share .72 1.99 2.56 4.26 4.48
Cash dividends per share 1.60 1.60 1.20 1.20 1.20
Net working capital 467 481 354 611 570
Current ratio 1.24 to 1 1.45 to 1 1.25 to 1 1.51 to 1 1.47 to 1
Total assets $6,047 $2,939 $3,162 $3,128 $3,094
Long-term debt 1,633 160 160 470 690
Total long-term obligations 2,757 468 426 688 727
Long-term debt as a percentage of
shareholders' equity 126.6% 12.1% 12.8% 39.8% 66.8%
Operating margin as a percentage of
Net sales 3.0 3.8 3.9 6.1 5.3
Average operating assets 5.2 7.7 8.2 12.4 10.1
Net income as a percentage of
Net sales .5 1.9 2.2 3.5 3.8
Average assets .8 3.1 3.8 6.5 6.7
Average shareholders' equity 2.7 7.5 9.9 18.1 22.1
Research and development expenses
Contract $1,477 $1,603 $1,693 $1,601 $2,164
Noncontract 121 97 93 102 156
Payroll and employee benefits 2,661 1,906 2,001 2,109 2,099
Number of employees at
year-end 42,400 29,800 33,600 36,200 38,200
Number of shareholders
at year-end 11,241 11,618 12,599 13,607 14,483
Depreciation $ 227 $ 214 $ 160 $ 171 $ 187
Amortization of
Goodwill 27
Other purchased intangibles 15
Maintenance and repairs 105 87 106 97 83
Rent expense 84 47 52 51 47
Floor area (millions of square feet)
Owned 21.3 12.9 12.6 12.2 11.6
Commercially leased 7.5 3.2 4.2 4.5 5.4
Leased from United States
Government 9.4 2.1 1.9 1.7 1.6
NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL POSITION
December 31, $ in millions 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990
Assets:
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents $ 17 $ 100 $ 230 $ 203 $ 173
Accounts receivable 1,202 820 791 860 844
Inventoried costs 1,043 569 670 693 721
Refundable federal income taxes 84
Deferred income taxes 38 46 38 28
Prepaid expenses 47 25 31 23 47
Total current assets 2,431 1,560 1,760 1,807 1,785
Property, plant and equipment at cost
Land and land improvements 203 118 117 117 106
Buildings 857 744 719 703 715
Machinery and other equipment 2,024 1,898 1,982 1,990 1,926
Leasehold improvements 62 29 59 65 63
3,146 2,789 2,877 2,875 2,810
Accumulated depreciation (1,768) (1,773) (1,753) (1,698) (1,571)
1,378 1,016 1,124 1,177 1,239
Other assets
Goodwill, net of amortization of $27 1,359
Other purchased intangibles, net of
amortization of $15 376
Prepaid pension cost, intangible
pension asset and benefit trust fund 222 278 190 98 65
Deferred income taxes 203 7 7 12
Investments in and advances to
affiliates and sundry assets 78 78 81 34 5
2,238 363 278 144 70
$ 6,047 $ 2,939 $ 3,162 $ 3,128 $ 3,094
NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION
December 31, $ in millions 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990
Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity:
Current liabilities
Notes payable to banks $ 171 $ $ 100 $ $
Current portion of long-term debt 130 250 80 260
Trade accounts payable 396 324 363 407 330
Accrued employees' compensation 228 146 144 157 143
Advances on contracts 184 40 39 28 8
Income taxes payable 55 12 25 12
Deferred income taxes 413 426 389 353 336
Other current liabilities 387 131 121 146 126
Total current liabilities 1,964 1,079 1,406 1,196 1,215
Long-term debt 1,633 160 160 470 690
Accrued retiree benefits 1,070 308 266 218 37
Other long term obligations 54
Deferred gain on sale/leaseback 20 23 26 29 32
Deferred income taxes 16 47 50 33 87
Shareholders' equity
Paid-in capital
Preferred stock, 10,000,000 shares
authorized; and none issued
Common stock, 200,000,000 shares
authorized; issued and outstanding
1994 49,241,642; 1993 48,913,403;
1992 47,398,303; 1991 47,090,248;
1990 46,937,671 265 256 207 199 196
Retained earnings 1,026 1,070 1,051 987 843
Unvested employee restricted award shares (1) (2) (2) (4) (6)
Unfunded pension losses, net of taxes (2) (2)
1,290 1,322 1,254 1,182 1,033
$ 6,047 $ 2,939 $ 3,162 $ 3,128 $ 3,094
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
Year ended December 31, $ in millions,
except per share 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990
Net sales $6,711 $5,063 $5,550 $5,694 $5,490
Cost of sales
Operating costs 5,477 4,385 4,877 4,817 4,746
Administrative and general expenses 753 485 455 531 451
Special termination benefits 282
Operating margin 199 193 218 346 293
Other income(deductions)
Gain on sale of Corporate Headquarters 101
Interest income 6 2 4 11 3
Other, net (31) 13 5 10
Interest expense (109) (38) (47) (80) (95)
Income before income taxes and cumulative
effect of accounting principle changes 65 170 180 277 312
Federal and foreign income taxes 30 74 59 9 102
Income before cumulative effect of
accounting principle changes 35 96 121 268 210
Cumulative effect on prior years of
changes in accounting principles for
Income taxes 21
Retiree health care and life insurance
benefits (88)
Net income $ 35 $ 96 $ 121 $ 201 $ 210
Weighted average common shares
outstanding, in millions 49.2 48.1 47.2 47.1 47.0
Earnings per share before cumulative
effect of accounting principle changes $ .72 $ 1.99 $ 2.56 $ 5.69 $ 4.48
Cumulative effect on prior years of
changes in accounting principles, per
share, for
Income taxes .43
Retiree health care and life
insurance benefits (1.86)
Earnings per share $ .72 $ 1.99 $ 2.56 $ 4.26 $ 4.48
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES
IN SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Year ended December 31, $ in millions,
except per share 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990
Paid-in Capital
At beginning of year $ 256 $ 207 $ 199 $ 196 $ 196
Employee stock awards and options
exercised, net of forfeitures 9 49 8 3
At end of year 265 256 207 199 196
Retained Earnings
At beginning of year 1,070 1,051 987 843 689
Net income 35 96 121 201 210
Cash dividends (79) (77) (57) (57) (56)
At end of year 1,026 1,070 1,051 987 843
Unvested Employee Restricted Award Shares
At beginning of year (2) (2) (4) (6) (10)
Forfeitures, net of grants 1 3
Amortization 1 1 2 1
At end of year (1) (2) (2) (4) (6)
Unfunded Pension Losses, Net of Taxes
At beginning of year (2) (2)
Change in excess of additional
minimum liability over
unrecognized prior service costs 2 (2)
At end of year (2) (2)
Total shareholders' equity $1,290 $1,322 $1,254 $1,182 $1,033
Book value per share $26.20 $27.04 $26.46 $25.11 $22.00
Cash dividends per share 1.60 1.60 1.20 1.20 1.20
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Year ended December 31, $ in millions 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990
Operating Activities
Sources of Cash
Cash received from customers
Progress payments $ 2,616 $ 2,028 $ 2,647 $ 2,647 $ 2,618
Other collections 4,767 2,924 2,914 3,050 2,977
Interest received 6 2 4 11 2
Income tax refunds received 11 3 3 1
Other cash receipts 13 6 5 13 17
Cash provided by operating activities 7,413 4,963 5,570 5,724 5,615
Uses of Cash
Cash paid to suppliers and employees 6,786 4,484 5,186 4,986 5,220
Interest paid 94 42 47 85 97
Income taxes paid 90 52 48 32 14
Other cash payments 2 5 5 12 18
Cash used in operating activities 6,972 4,583 5,286 5,115 5,349
Net cash provided by operating activities 441 380 284 609 266
Investing Activities
Payment for purchase, net of cash acquired, of
Grumman Corporation (1,842)
Vought Aircraft Company (12)
Additions to property, plant and equipment (134) (135) (123) (118) (121)
Proceeds from sale of marketable securities 28
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment 17 2 5 3 252
Funding of retiree benefit trust (31)
Proceeds from sale of affiliates 8
Dividends from affiliates, net of
investments 5 2 (47)
Other investing activities 6 (8) (3)
Net cash provided by (used in)
investing activities (1,963) (123) (165) (123) 128
Financing Activities
Borrowings under lines of credit 2,371 55 100 750
Repayment of borrowings under
lines of credit (1,200) (155) (920)
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt 600
Principal payments of long-term
debt/capital leases (251) (251) (140) (400)
Proceeds from issuance of stock 7 41 5 1
Dividends paid (79) (77) (57) (57) (56)
Other financing activities (9)
Net cash provided by (used in)
financing activities 1,439 (387) (92) (456) (226)
Increase(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents (83) (130) 27 30 168
Cash and cash equivalents balance at
beginning of year 100 230 203 173 5
Cash and cash equivalents balance at end of year $ 17 $ 100 $ 230 $ 203 $ 173
NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION
Year ended December 31, $ in millions 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990
Reconciliation of Net Income to Net Cash
Provided by Operating Activities:
Net income $ 35 $ 96 $ 121 $ 201 $ 210
Adjustments to reconcile net income to
net cash provided
Depreciation 227 214 160 171 187
Amortization of intangible assets 42
Common stock issued to employees 1 3 3 4 4
Amortization of restricted award shares 1 1 2 1
Loss(gain) on disposals of property,
plant and equipment 33 26 11 6 (103)
Cumulative effect on prior years of
changes in accounting principles for
Income taxes (21)
Retiree health care and life insurance
benefits 88
Noncash retiree pension cost(income) (47) (40) (43) 14 (53)
Special termination benefits 282
Amortization of deferred gain on sale/leaseback (3) (3) (3) (3) (2)
Decrease(increase) in
Accounts receivable 209 (4) 339 1,058 (1,085)
Inventoried costs (368) 142 63 123 50
Prepaid expenses (41) (10) (17) (8)
Refundable income taxes (84) 8
Increase(decrease) in
Progress payments 407 (90) (340) (1,054) 1,204
Accounts payable and accruals (268) (29) (44) 114 (211)
Provisions for contract losses (84) 36 9 (100) (41)
Provisions for disposal of real estate and
other assets 42 1 1 2
Deferred income taxes 78 26 48 93
Income taxes payable (25) 12 (25) 13 6
Other noncash transactions 4 (1) (2)
Net cash provided by operating activities $ 441 $ 380 $ 284 $ 609 $ 266
Noncash Investing and Financing Activities:
Purchase of Grumman Corporation
Fair value of assets acquired $ 3,495
Cash paid (2,129)
Liabilities assumed $ 1,366
Purchase of Vought Aircraft Company
Fair value of assets acquired $ 722
Cash paid (130)
Liabilities assumed $ 592
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the
corporation and its subsidiaries. All material intercompany accounts,
transactions and profits are eliminated in consolidation.
Industry Segment and Major Customer Data
Descriptions of the company's principal products and services can be
found in the Management's Discussion and Analysis section of this
report. Intersegment sales are transacted at cost incurred with no
profit added. Operating profit is defined to include the Other Income
earned by each industry segment, but exclude costs allocated to them
for general corporate expenses and state and local income taxes. For
segment reporting, the amount of the costs of retiree benefit plans
(pension and nonpension) allocable to contracts as determined by
government cost accounting standards captioned Retiree Benefit Cost
Included in Contract Costs and the income(cost) of retiree benefit
plans (pension and nonpension) as calculated in conformity with
financial accounting standards captioned Retiree Benefit Income(Cost)
are shown separately from general corporate expenses so as not to
distort operating profit as reported by industry segment. General
corporate assets include cash and cash equivalents, corporate office
furnishings and equipment, other unallocable property, investments in
affiliates, prepaid pension cost, intangible pension asset, benefit
trust fund assets and certain assets held for sale.
Sales to the company's major customer, the U.S. Government
(including foreign military sales), are reported within each industry
segment and in total in Selected Financial Data. The company does not
conduct a significant volume of activity through foreign operations or
in foreign currencies.
NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION
Sales
Sales under cost-reimbursement, service, research and development, and
construction-type contracts are recorded as costs are incurred and
include estimated earned fees or profits calculated on the basis of the
relationship between costs incurred and total estimated costs
(cost-to-cost type of percentage-of-completion method of accounting).
Construction-type contracts embrace those fixed-price type contracts
that provide for the delivery at a low volume per year or a small
number of units after a lengthy period of time over which a significant
amount of costs have been incurred. Sales under other types of
contracts are recorded as deliveries are made and are computed on the
basis of the estimated final average unit cost plus profit
(units-of-delivery type of percentage-of-completion method of
accounting).
Certain contracts contain provisions for price redetermination or
for cost or performance incentives. Such redetermined amounts or
incentives are included in sales when the amounts can reasonably be
determined. In the case of the B-2 bomber production contract any
future increases in operating margin will be recognized on a units-of-
delivery basis and recorded as each equivalent production unit is
delivered. Amounts representing contract change orders, claims or
limitations in funding are included in sales only when they can be
reliably estimated and realization is probable. In the period in which
it is determined that a loss will result from the performance of a
contract, the entire amount of the estimated ultimate loss is charged
against income. Loss provisions are first offset against costs that are
included in assets, with any remaining amount reflected in Other
Current Liabilities. Other changes in estimates of sales, costs, and
profits are recognized using the cumulative catch-up method of
accounting. This method recognizes in the current period the cumulative
effect of the changes on current and prior periods. Hence, the effect
of the changes on future periods of contract performance is recognized
as if the revised estimates had been the original estimates.
Contract Research and Development
Customer-sponsored research and development costs (direct and indirect
costs incurred pursuant to contractual arrangements) are accounted for
like other contract costs.
Noncontract Research and Development
This category includes independent research and development costs
(indirect costs allocable to U.S. Government contracts) and
company-sponsored research and development costs (direct and indirect
costs not recoverable under contractual arrangements). Independent
research and development (IR&D) costs are included in administrative
and general expenses while company-sponsored research and development
costs are charged against income as incurred.
Environmental Costs
Environmental liabilities are accrued when the company determines its
responsibility for cleanup costs and such amounts are reasonably
estimable. When only a range of amounts is established and no amount
within the range is better than another, the minimum amount in the
range is recorded. The company does not anticipate and record
insurance recoveries before collection is probable.
Interest Rate Swap Agreements
The company enters into interest rate swap agreements to offset the
variable rate characteristic of certain term loans outstanding under
the company's Credit Agreement. Interest on these interest rate swap
agreements is recognized as interest income or expense in the period
incurred.
Income Taxes
Provisions for federal, state and local income taxes are calculated on
reported financial statement pretax income based on current tax law and
also include, in the current period, the cumulative effect of any
changes in tax rates from those used previously in determining deferred
tax assets and liabilities. Such provisions differ from the amounts
currently payable because certain items of income and expense are
recognized in different time periods for financial reporting purposes
than for income tax purposes.
The company accounts for certain contracts in process using
different methods of accounting for financial statements and tax
reporting and thus provides deferred taxes on the difference between
the financial and taxable income reported during the performance of
such contracts.
State and local income and franchise tax provisions are included in
administrative and general expenses.
NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION
Earnings per Share
Earnings per Share are based on the weighted average number of shares
of common stock outstanding during each period, after giving
recognition to stock splits and stock dividends. The dilutive effect of
common stock equivalents, shares under stock options, was
insignificant.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Included are interest-earning debt instruments that mature in three
months or less from the date purchased. Amounts reported in the
Consolidated Statements of Financial Position approximate their fair
value.
Accounts Receivable
Included are amounts billed and currently due from customers under all
types of contracts; amounts currently due but unbilled (primarily
related to contracts accounted for under the
cost-to-cost type of percentage-of-completion method of accounting);
certain estimated contract changes; and claims in negotiation and
amounts retained pending contract completion.
Inventoried Costs
Inventoried costs primarily relate to work in process under fixed-price
type contracts (excluding those included in unbilled accounts
receivable as previously described). They represent accumulated
contract costs less the portion of such costs allocated to delivered
items. Accumulated contract costs include direct production costs,
factory and engineering overhead, production tooling costs, and
allowable administrative and general expenses (except for general
corporate expenses and IR&D allocable to commercial contracts, which
are charged against income as incurred).
In accordance with industry practice, inventoried costs are
classified as a current asset and include amounts related to contracts
having production cycles longer than one year.
NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION
Depreciable Properties
Property, plant and equipment owned by the company are depreciated over
the estimated useful lives of individual assets. Capital leases
providing for the transfer of ownership upon their expiration or
containing bargain purchase options are amortized over the estimated
useful lives of individual assets. Most of these assets are depreciated
using declining-balance methods, with the remainder using the
straight-line method, with the following lives:
Years
Land improvements 4-25
Buildings 4-45
Machinery and other equipment 2-20
Leasehold improvements Length of lease
Goodwill and Other Purchased Intangible Assets
Goodwill and other purchased intangible assets are amortized on a
straight-line basis over periods of 40 years and a weighted average 23
years, respectively. Goodwill and other purchased intangibles balances
are included in the identifiable assets of the industry segment to
which they have been assigned and amortization is charged against the
respective industry segment operating profit. The future profitability
and cash flow of the operations to which they relate are evaluated
annually. These factors, along with management's plans with respect to
the operations are considered in assessing the recoverability of
goodwill and other purchased intangibles.
Acquisitions
In April 1994, the company purchased the outstanding stock of Grumman
Corporation (Grumman) at a cost of $2.1 billion and financed the
transaction mainly with new borrowings. The operations of Grumman
since acquisition are included in the industry segments to which
products are associated.
In August 1994 the company purchased the remaining 51 percent
interest in Vought Aircraft Company (Vought) for $130 million cash.
The company had previously purchased a 49 percent interest in Vought
for $45 million in September 1992. The operations of Vought since
August 1994 are included in the military and commercial aircraft
industry segment.
NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION
The purchase method of accounting was used to record both
acquisitions with estimated fair values being assigned to assets and
liabilities. The excess of the purchase price over the net tangible
assets acquired was assigned to identifiable intangible assets and the
balance to goodwill.
Northrop Corporation was renamed Northrop Grumman Corporation
effective May 18, 1994. The following unaudited proforma financial
information combines Northrop's, Grumman's and Vought's results of
operations as if the acquisitions had taken place on January 1, 1993,
and is not necessarily indicative of future operating results for
Northrop Grumman.
$ in millions, except per share 1994 1993
Sales $7,770 $8,653
Net income 57 112
Earnings per share 1.16 2.33
Financial Statement Reclassification
To conform to the presentation in 1994, certain liabilities and other
deductions have been reclassified in the Consolidated Statements of
Financial Position and Consolidated Statements of Income for 1993 and
prior years. The reclassifications had no effect on total liabilities
or net income for any period presented.
Accounts Receivable
Unbilled amounts represent sales for which billings have not been
presented to customers at year end, including differences between
actual and estimated overhead and margin rates. These amounts are
usually billed and collected within one year, progress payments are
however received on a number of fixed-price contracts accounted for
using the cost-to-cost type percentage-of-completion method.
Amounts due upon contract completion are retained by customers until
work is completed and customer acceptance is obtained.
Accounts receivable at December 31, 1994, are expected to be
collected in 1995 except for approximately $31 million due in 1996 and
$7 million due in 1997 and later. These amounts principally relate to
long-term contracts with the U.S. Government.
NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION
Allowances for doubtful amounts represent mainly estimates of
overhead type costs which may not be successfully negotiated and
collected.
Contract loss provisions are reflected as an offset to accounts
receivable to the extent related costs are contained therein.
Accounts receivable were comprised of the following:
$ in millions 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990
Due from U.S. Government, long-term contracts
Current accounts
Billed $ 420 $ 65 $ 82 $ 70 $ 65
Unbilled 3,140 3,050 3,100 3,518 4,467
Progress payments received (2,532) (2,410) (2,467) (2,777) (3,757)
Net current accounts 1,028 705 715 811 775
Due upon contract completion 55 14 19 4 10
1,083 719 734 815 785
Due from other customers, long-term contracts
Current accounts
Billed 74 66 31 37 39
Unbilled 41 43 48 15 58
115 109 79 52 97
Total due, long-term contracts 1,198 828 813 867 882
Trade and other accounts receivable
Due from U.S. Government 34 36 28 38 33
Due from other customers 34 13 7 7 11
Total due, trade and other 68 49 35 45 44
1,266 877 848 912 926
Allowances for doubtful amounts (64) (57) (57) (52) (82)
$ 1,202 $ 820 $ 791 $ 860 $ 844
NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION
Inventoried Costs
Inventoried costs were comprised of the following:
$ in millions 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990
Production costs of contracts in
process $1,384 $ 800 $ 920 $ 976 $1,050
Administrative and general expenses 270 95 109 106 134
1,654 895 1,029 1,082 1,184
Progress payments received (611) (326) (359) (389) (463)
$1,043 $ 569 $ 670 $ 693 $ 721
Inventoried costs relate to long-term contracts in process and
include expenditures for raw materials and work in process beyond what
is required for recorded orders. These expenditures are incurred to
help maintain stable and efficient production schedules. However, no
material amount representing claims, learning curve, unamortized
tooling or other deferred costs is included in inventoried costs.
The ratio of inventoried administrative and general expenses to
total inventoried costs is assumed to be the same as the ratio of total
administrative and general expenses to total contract costs.
According to the provisions of U.S. Government contracts, the
customer has title to, or a security interest in, substantially all
inventories related to such contracts.
NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION
Income Taxes
Income tax expense, both federal and foreign (which arises primarily from work
performed abroad by domestic operations), was comprised of the following:
$ in millions 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990
Currently payable
Federal income taxes $ 61 $ 41 $ 7 $ 11 $ 9
Foreign income taxes 1 1 1
62 42 8 11 9
Change in deferred federal income taxes (32) 32 51 (2) 93
$ 30 $ 74 $ 59 $ 9 $ 102
Income tax expense differs from the amount computed by multiplying the
statutory federal income tax rate times the income before income taxes due to
the following:
$ in millions 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990
Income tax expense at statutory rate $ 23 $ 59 $ 61 $ 94 $ 106
Goodwill amortization 9
Provision for nondeductible expenses 4 1 1 8 1
Benefit from ESOP dividends (4) (4) (3) (3) (6)
Dividend exclusion (2)
Retroactive effect of statutory rate
increase 18
Research and experimentation tax credit (90)
Investment tax credit, net 1
$ 30 $ 74 $ 59 $ 9 $ 102
NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION
The research and experimentation tax credit shown for 1991 was the
result of an internal company study that determined the amount earned
over the years 1981 through 1990 in excess of the amount previously
recognized for those years pending final government regulations which
were not issued until 1989.
Deferred income taxes arise because of differences in the treatment
of income and expense items for financial reporting and income tax
purposes. The principal type of temporary difference stems from the
recognition of income on contracts being reported under different
methods for tax purposes than for financial reporting. Effective
January, 1991, the company adopted FASB Statement No. 109 - Accounting
for Income Taxes.
The tax effects of significant temporary differences and
carryforwards that gave rise to year-end deferred federal and state tax
balances, as broadly categorized in the Consolidated Statements of
Financial Position, were as follows:
NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION
$ in millions 1994 1993 1992 1991
Deferred tax assets
Deductible temporary differences
Retiree benefit plan expense $ 409 $ 21 $ 21 $ 16
Provision for estimated expenses 39 28 27 26
Income on contracts 17 21 13 8
Other 52 2 2 3
517 72 63 53
Taxable temporary differences
Purchased intangibles (133)
Excess tax over book depreciation (94)
Retiree benefit plan income (48) (19) (15) (7)
Administrative and general expenses
period-costed for tax purposes (1) (3) (6)
(276) (19) (18) (13)
$ 241 $ 53 $ 45 $ 40
Deferred tax liabilities
Taxable temporary differences
Income on contracts $ 744 $ 811 $ 789 $ 772
Administrative and general expenses
period-costed for tax purposes 18 18 18 19
Retiree benefit plan income 94 64 33
Excess tax over book depreciation 70 89 93
Other 9
771 993 960 917
Deductible temporary differences
Provision for estimated expenses (145) (135) (120) (116)
Retiree benefit plan expense (2) (106) (93) (76)
Other (9) (11) (17)
(147) (250) (224) (209)
Tax carryforwards
Tax credits (105) (129) (140) (150)
Alternative minimum tax credit (90) (87) (40) (21)
Operating losses (54) (117) (151)
(195) (270) (297) (322)
$ 429 $ 473 $ 439 $ 386
Net deferred tax liability
Total deferred tax liabilities (taxable
temporary differences above) $1,047 $1,012 $ 978 $ 930
Less total deferred tax assets (deductible
temporary differences and tax carryforwards
above) 859 592 584 584
$ 188 $ 420 $ 394 $ 346
NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION
The tax carryforward benefits are expected to be used in the
periods that net deferred tax liabilities mature. The expiration dates
for these tax credit carryforwards are in various amounts over the
years 1995 through 2005. The alternative minimum tax credit can be
carried forward indefinitely.
Notes Payable to Banks and Long-Term Debt
The company has available short-term credit lines in the form of money
market facilities with several banks. The amount of and conditions for
borrowing under these credit lines depend on the availability and terms
prevailing in the marketplace. No fees or compensating balances are
required for these credit facilities. The average outstanding balance
for days on which borrowings were made during 1994 was $66 million, at
a weighted average interest rate of 5.4 percent. The maximum amount
outstanding during the year occurred on November 14, 1994 - $179
million at a weighted average interest rate of 5.6 percent. At
December 31, 1994, $171 million was outstanding at a weighted average
interest rate of 7.0 percent.
Additionally, the company began 1994 with a $400 million credit
agreement with a group of domestic and foreign banks. During 1994, the
company replaced the $400-million credit agreement with a new credit
agreement with a group of domestic and foreign banks. This new Credit
Agreement provides for two credit facilities: $800 million available
on a revolving credit basis through March 1999 and, used to finance the
acquisition of Grumman Corporation, a floating interest rate $2 billion
term loan payable quarterly through March 1999.
During 1994 the company prepaid $900 million in addition to paying
the $100 million September quarterly installment under the term loan
facility. In December 1994 the company amended the Credit Agreement to
provide for repayment of the $1 billion balance of the term loan in 14
quarterly installments of $62.5 million plus interest beginning in
September 1995, with a final installment of $125 million due in March
1999.
In 1994 there were no borrowings under any of the company's
revolving credit facilities. The company paid an average facility fee
in 1994 of .20 percent per annum on the total amount of the revolving
credit facility. Under these agreements, in the event of a "change in
control," the banks are relieved of their commitments. Compensating
balances are not required under these agreements.
NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION
The company's credit agreements contain restrictions relating to
the payment of dividends, acquisition of the company's stock, aggregate
indebtedness for borrowed money and the maintenance of shareholders'
equity. At December 31, 1994, $331 million of retained earnings were
unrestricted as to the payment of dividends. Total indebtedness for all
types of borrowed money is limited under the company's credit agreement
covenants. At December 31, 1994, indebtedness was limited to $3.5
billion.
Long-term debt consisted of the following:
$ in millions 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990
Notes due 1999, 8.4% $ 153 $ $ $ $
Notes due 2004, 8.625% 350
Debentures due 2024, 9.375% 250
Notes payable to institutional investors 160 370 370 550
Mortgages and notes payable at rates from
4.3% to 12.5% with maturities through 2001 10
Term loans payable to banks due in quarterly
installments through 1999 at floating rates 1,000
Term loans payable to banks at floating rates 40 180 400
1,763 160 410 550 950
Less current portion 130 250 80 260
$1,633 $ 160 $ 160 $ 470 $ 690
In October 1994, the company issued $350 million of 8.625 percent
notes and $250 million of 9.375 percent debentures, pursuant to a
public offering. The net proceeds from the offering were used to
prepay $600 million of indebtedness under the company's existing term
loan facility. In September 1994, the company paid the $160 million
notes payable to institutional investors due in 1995, incurring an
early payment penalty of $7 million. In 1994 the company also acquired
in the open market $58 million of the notes due in 1999 and recorded a
gain of $2 million. The notes due in 1999 are callable at any time
after January 1, 1996 at par and the debentures due in 2024 are
callable after October 15, 2004 at a premium of 4 percent declining to
par after 2013.
NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION
The borrowings under the term loans bear interest at various rates
generally equal to the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus .43
percent. To mitigate the variable rate characteristic of the term
loans, the company entered into interest rate swap agreements with
several banks resulting in a fixed interest rate of 6.47 percent on
$200 million through May 1997. The maximum outstanding under the term
loan during 1994 was $2 billion from August 31 to September 21 at a
weighted average interest rate of 5.46 percent and the average
outstanding in 1994 was $1.5 billion at a weighted average interest
rate of 5.58 percent. Principal payments permanently reduce the amount
available under this agreement as well as the debt outstanding.
The principal amount of long-term debt outstanding at December 31,
1994, is due in: 1995 - $130 million, 1996 - $255 million, 1997 - $253
million, 1998 - $252 million, 1999 - $272 million and after five years
$601 million.
The fair value of long-term debt at each yearend was calculated
based on interest rates available for debt with terms and due dates
similar to the company's. The estimated fair value of debt outstanding
at each respective year-end was: 1994 - $1,758 million, 1993 - $160
million and 1992 - $443 million.
Retirement Benefits
The company sponsors several defined-benefit pension plans covering
substantially all employees. Pension benefits for most employees are
based on the employee's years of service and compensation during the
last ten years before retirement. It is the policy of the company to
fund at least the minimum amount required for all qualified plans,
using actuarial cost methods and assumptions acceptable under U.S.
Government regulations, by making payments into a trust separate from
the company. Three of the eight qualified plans, including two of the
three main plans which cover over 80 percent of all employees, were in
a legally defined full-funding limitation status. No contributions
have been made to the Northrop Grumman Retirement Plan since 1986. To
protect the surplus of assets in the master trust from a "change in
control" the trust agreement and the Northrop Grumman Retirement Plan
were appropriately amended during 1991.
The company and subsidiaries also sponsor defined-contribution plans
in which all employees are eligible to participate. Company
contributions, up to 4 percent of compensation, are based on a formula
resulting in the matching of employee contributions.
NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION
In addition, the company and its subsidiaries provide certain
health care and life insurance benefits for retired employees.
Employees achieve eligibility to participate in these contributory
plans upon retirement from active service and if they meet specified
age and years of service requirements. Election to participate must be
made at the date of retirement. Qualifying dependents are also eligible
for medical coverage. Approximately 80 percent of the company's current
retirees participate in the medical plans. The cost and funded status
for the medical and life benefits are combined in the tables that
follow because (1) life benefits constitute an insignificant amount of the
combined cost, and (2) for those plans with assets, the assets in trust
for each plan can be used to pay benefits under either plan. Plan
documents reserve the company's right to amend or terminate the plans
at any time. Premiums charged retirees for medical coverage are based
on years of service and are annually adjusted for the cost of the plan
as determined by an independent actuary. In addition to this medical
inflation cost-sharing feature, the plan also has provisions for
deductibles, copayments, coinsurance percentages, out-of-pocket limits,
schedule of reasonable fees, managed care providers, maintenance of
benefits with other plans, Medicare carve-out and a maximum lifetime
benefit of from $250,000 to $1,000,000 per covered individual. It is
the policy of the company to fund the maximum amount deductible for
income taxes into the VEBA trust established for the Northrop Retiree
Health Care Plan for Retired Employees for payment of benefits. Until
1991, the costs accrued for these plans were determined by the
aggregate actuarial cost method with such amounts paid by the company,
along with retiree contributions, into a separate trust. The company
elected to implement the new accounting standard, FASB Statement No.
106 Employer's Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other Than
Pensions, for 1991 by immediately recognizing the January 1, 1991,
accumulated postretirement benefit obligation of $437 million. This
amount was offset by $292 million, the fair value of plan assets held
in trust outside the company, in recording a net obligation and pretax
charge to operations of $145 million.
NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION
The cost to the company of these plans in each of the last five
years is shown in the following table.
$ in millions 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990
Defined-benefit pension plans
Actual return on assets $ 25 $(449) $(298) $(825) $ 26
Deferral of actual return on assets (541) 153 38 604 (255)
Expected return on assets (516) (296) (260) (221) (229)
Service cost 176 104 99 88 92
Interest cost 372 190 175 158 147
Amortization of unrecognized items
Transition asset, net (42) (42) (42) (42) (42)
Prior service costs 14 15 13 14 14
Net gain from previous years (40) (42) (68) (20) (35)
Net periodic pension income $ (36) $ (71) $ (83) $ (23) $ (53)
Defined-contribution plans $ 59 $ 47 $ 48 $ 45 $ 44
Retiree health care and life insurance benefit plans
Actual return on assets $ 22 $ (19) $ (10) $ (85)
Deferral of actual return on assets (42) (1) (10) 69
Expected return on assets (20) (20) (20) (16)
Service cost 28 21 25 24
Interest cost 61 37 39 39
Amortization of unrecognized gain from
previous years (2) (6) (3)
Excess dependent cost 2
Net periodic postretirement benefit cost $ 69 $ 32 $ 41 $ 47 $ 29
In addition to the net periodic pension income and postretirement
benefit cost, in 1994 the company recognized the effect of an early
retirement incentive program of $250 million for pension and $32
million for postretirement benefits. The total $282 million effect on
the company's 1994 operating margin is shown in the Consolidated
Statements of Income under the caption Special Termination Benefits.
NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION
Major assumptions as of each year-end used in the accounting for
the defined-benefit plans are shown in the following table. Pension
cost is determined using all three factors as of the beginning of each
year, whereas the funded status of the plans, shown later, uses only
the first two factors, as of the end of each year.
The company changed the discount rate for obligations and rate of
increase for compensation assumptions in calculating the funded status
of the plans at December 31, 1994. The changes resulted in a $499
million decrease in the projected benefit obligation for pension plans
and an $85 million decrease in the accumulated postretirement benefit
obligation.
1994 1993 1992 1991 1990
Discount rate for obligations 8.25% 7.00% 8.00% 8.00% 8.50%
Rate of increase for compensation 5.25 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.50
Expected long-term rate of return on
plan assets 8.75 8.25 8.25 8.25 8.25
These assumptions were also used in retiree health care and life
insurance benefit calculations with one modification. Since, unlike the
pension trust, the earnings of the VEBA trust are taxable, the above
8.75 percent expected rate of return on plan assets was reduced
accordingly to 5.25 percent after taxes. A significant factor used in
estimating future per capita cost, for the company and its retirees, of
covered health care benefits is the health care cost trend rate
assumption. The rate used was 9 percent for 1994 and is assumed to
decrease gradually to 6 percent for 2006 and remain at that level
thereafter. An additional one-percentage-point of increase each year in
that rate would result in an $11 million annual increase in the
aggregate of the service and interest cost components of net periodic
postretirement benefit cost, and a $109 million increase in the
accumulated postretirement benefit obligation at December 31, 1994.
NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION
The following tables set forth the funded status and amounts
recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Position at each
year-end for the company's defined-benefit pension and retiree health
care and life insurance benefit plans. The summary showing pension
plans whose accumulated benefits are in excess of assets at December
31, 1994, is comprised of five qualified plans along with ten unfunded
nonqualified plans for benefits provided to directors, officers and
employees either beyond those provided by, or payable under, the
company's main plans.
$ in millions 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990
Pension plans whose assets exceed
accumulated benefits
Actuarial present value of benefit obligations
Vested benefits $ 2,487 $ 2,059 $ 1,690 $ 1,538 $ 1,335
Nonvested benefits 228 175 153 147 125
Accumulated benefit obligations 2,715 2,234 1,843 1,685 1,460
Effect of assumed salary rate increases 409 453 421 387 325
Projected benefit obligations 3,124 2,687 2,264 2,072 1,785
Less market value of plan assets 4,210 3,970 3,642 3,458 2,708
Excess of assets over projected benefit
obligations (1,086) (1,283) (1,378) (1,386) (923)
Unrecognized items
Net transition asset 332 374 415 458 501
Prior service costs (307) (114) (133) (135) (146)
Net gain 897 764 916 972 513
Accrued retiree benefits pension asset
included in Consolidated Statements of
Financial Position $ (164) $ (259) $ (180) $ (91) $ (55)
Pension plans whose accumulated benefits
exceed assets
Actuarial present value of benefit obligations
Vested benefits $ 2,865 $ 57 $ 33 $ 32 $ 38
Nonvested benefits 252 3 2
Accumulated benefit obligations 3,117 60 33 32 40
Effect of assumed salary rate increases 16 19 3 3 3
Projected benefit obligations 3,133 79 36 35 43
Less market value of plan assets 2,872 16 10
Excess of projected benefit obligations
over assets 261 63 36 35 33
Unrecognized items
Net transition obligation (4) (5) (4) (5) (7)
Prior service costs (8) (14) 5 (7) (10)
Net gain(loss) 1 (7) (3) 9 13
Additional minimum liability 6 12 7 3 3
Accrued retiree benefits liability
included in Consolidated Statements of
Financial Position $ 256 $ 49 $ 41 $ 35 $ 32
NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION
Pension plan assets at December 31, 1994, were comprised of 46
percent domestic equity type investments in listed companies (including
five percent in Northrop Grumman common stock), 11 percent equity
investments listed on international exchanges, three percent in cash
and venture capital real estate and 40 percent in fixed income type
investments, principally in U.S. Government securities. The investment
in Northrop Grumman represents 5,985,060 shares, or 12 percent of the
company's total shares outstanding.
Effective January 1, 1995, the company adopted amendments to two
of the company's retirement plans to cap the maximum years of service
credit that an employee can earn and adjusted the amount of service
credit earned each year. The effect of these changes was to increase
the projected benefit obligation at December 31, 1994 by $210 million.
$ in millions 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990
Retiree health care and life insurance
benefit plans
Accumulated postretirement benefit
obligation (APBO)
Retirees $ 575 $ 274 $ 243 $ 240 $ 206
Fully eligible active employees 172 86 82 97 83
Active employees not yet eligible 258 192 194 172 148
1,005 552 519 509 437
Less market value of plan assets 353 373 369 372 292
Excess of APBO over assets 652 179 150 137 145
Unrecognized items
Net transition obligation (145)
Net gain 156 74 72 45
Accrued retiree benefits liability
included in Consolidated
Statements of Financial Position $ 808 $ 253 $ 222 $ 182 $
Retiree health care and life insurance plan assets at December 31,
1994, were almost entirely comprised of equity type investments in
listed companies.
NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION
Contingencies
The corporation and its subsidiaries have been named as defendants in
various legal actions. Based upon available information, it is the
company's expectation that those actions are either without merit or
will have no material adverse effect on the company's results of
operations or financial position. Minimum rental commitments under
long-term noncancellable operating leases total $226 million which
is payable as follows; 1995 - $66 million, 1996 - $43 million,
1997 - $33 million, 1998 - $23 million, 1999 - $19 million, and
2000 and thereafter - $42 million.
Stock Rights
On September 21, 1988, the company adopted a Common Stock Purchase
Rights plan. One right for each outstanding share of common stock was
issued to shareholders of record on October 5, 1988. The rights will
become exercisable on the tenth business day after a person or group
has acquired 15 percent or more of the general voting power of the
company, or announces an intention to make a tender offer for 30
percent or more of such voting power, without the prior consent of the
Board of Directors. If the rights become exercisable, a holder will be
entitled to purchase one share of common stock from the company at an
initial exercise price of $105.
If a person acquires more than 15 percent of the then outstanding
voting power of the company or if the company is combined with an
acquiror, each right will entitle its holder to receive, upon exercise,
shares of the company's or the acquiror's (depending upon which is the
surviving company) common stock having a value equal to two times the
exercise price of the right.
The company will be entitled to redeem the rights at $.02 per
right at any time prior to the earlier of the date that a person has
acquired or obtained the right to acquire 15 percent of the general
voting power of the company or the expiration of the rights in October
1998. The rights are not exercisable until after the date on which the
company's prerogative to redeem the rights has expired. The rights do
not have voting or dividend privilege and cannot be traded
independently from the company's common stock until such time as they
become exercisable.
NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION
Long-Term Incentive Stock Plan
The company's 1993 Long-Term Incentive Stock Plan provides for stock
options, stock appreciation rights (SARs) and stock awards to key
employees. This plan added 2,300,000 shares, of which up to one-half
may be in the form of stock awards, to the pool available for future
grants. The number of shares reserved for future grants shown in the
following table reflects both stock options and stock awards.
Stock awards, in the form of restricted performance stock rights,
are granted to key employees without payment to the company.
Recipients of the rights earn shares of stock based on a total
shareholder return measure of performance over a five year period with
interim distributions beginning three years after grant. If at the end
of the five year period the performance objectives have not been met,
70 percent of the original grant will be forfeited. Compensation
expense is estimated and accrued over the vesting period.
Each grant of a stock option is made at the closing market price
on the date of the grant. When stock options are exercised, the amount
of the cash proceeds to the company is added to paid-in capital. Under
current accounting standards there are no additions to or deductions
from income in connection with these options.
Termination of employment can result in forfeiture of some or all
of the benefits extended under the plans.
NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION
Stock option activity for the last five years is summarized below:
Shares
Shares Shares Reserved for
Under Option Exercisable Future Grants
Outstanding at January 1, 1990, nonstatutory
options with 1,800,000 SARs, at $17 to $47
per share 2,143,520 1,419,120 2,056,467
Granted 739,600
Cancelled (36,800)
Outstanding at December 31, 1990, nonstatutory
options with 1,800,000 SARs, at $15 to $47
per share 2,846,320 1,491,420 1,161,149
Granted 67,000
Cancelled (54,420)
Exercised or surrendered, at $17 to $19 per
share (35,030)
Outstanding at December 31, 1991, nonstatutory
options with 1,800,000 SARs, at $15 to $47
per share 2,823,870 1,841,070 1,152,902
Granted 635,700
Cancelled (43,380)
Exercised or surrendered, at $16 to $29 per
share (281,660)
Outstanding at December 31, 1992, nonstatutory
options at $15 to $47 per share 3,134,530 1,798,550 413,780
Granted 515,300
Cancelled (96,640)
Exercised or surrendered, at $15 to $30 per
share (1,405,330)
Outstanding at December 31, 1993, nonstatutory
options at $15 to $36 per share 2,147,860 738,300 1,618,640
Granted 708,700
Cancelled (61,215)
Exercised or surrendered, at $15 to $36 per
share (265,430)
Outstanding at December 31, 1994, nonstatutory
options at $15 to $43 per share 2,529,915 817,660 816,485
NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION
Unaudited Selected Quarterly Data
Quarterly financial results, previously reported in unaudited quarterly
reports to shareholders, are set forth in the following tables together
with dividend and common stock price data. Operating margin(loss) for
1993 and the first three quarters of 1994 has been restated to reflect
the reclassification of losses on disposals of machinery and other
equipment previously included in the "Other, net" classification in the
Consolidated Statements of Income.
1994 Quarters, $ in millions, except per share 4 3 2 1
Net sales $1,880 $1,927 $1,686 $1,218
Operating margin(loss) (107) 99 126 81
Net income(loss) (121) 39 65 52
Earnings(loss) per share (2.45) .79 1.33 1.05
Dividend per share .40 .40 .40 .40
Stock price:
High 47 3/8 45 3/8 39 3/4 45 7/8
Low 40 1/4 35 3/4 34 1/2 36 7/8
The operating loss in the fourth quarter of 1994 resulted from a
$282 million charge for a voluntary early retirement incentive program
offered in 1994 and a $42 million provision for the planned disposal of
real estate and other assets.
1993 Quarters, $ in millions, except per share 4 3 2 1
Net sales $1,256 $1,220 $1,312 $1,275
Operating margin(loss) (56) 77 89 83
Net income(loss) (35) 26 53 52
Earnings(loss) per share (.73) .54 1.12 1.09
Dividend per share .40 .40 .40 .40
Stock price:
High 39 1/4 42 3/8 42 5/8 37 3/8
Low 34 33 7/8 35 3/8 30 1/2
NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION
The sum of quarterly earnings per share for 1993 does not equal
earnings per share for the year because the average number of common
shares outstanding for the second half of 1993 was disproportionately
higher than the full year average due to the stock options exercised
during the second half.
Net income and earnings per share in the third quarter of 1993 were
reduced for the cumulative effect of the retroactive application of The
Revenue Reconciliation Act of 1993 signed into law August 10, 1993.
The one percentage point increase in the federal statutory income tax
rate required the redetermination of prior deferred tax asset and
liability balances as well as an increase in the taxes provided on
pretax earnings for the first three quarters of 1993. Third quarter
1993 net income and earnings per share were accordingly reduced by $18
million, 38 cents per share, and $2 million, 5 cents per share,
respectively.
The operating loss in the fourth quarter of 1993 resulted from a
$164 million provision for an increase in the estimated cost to
complete the TSSAM development contract. This provision followed
similar ones amounting to $14 million, $5 million and $18 million in
each of the three preceding quarters, respectively.
The corporation's common stock is traded on the New York and
Pacific Stock Exchanges (trading symbol NOC). The approximate number of
holders of record of the corporation's common stock at January 31,
1995, was 11,195.
NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
Board of Directors and Shareholders
Northrop Grumman Corporation
Los Angeles, California
We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of
financial position of Northrop Grumman Corporation and Subsidiaries as
of December 31 for each of the years 1990 through 1994, and the related
consolidated statements of income, changes in shareholders' equity and
cash flows for the years then ended. Our audits also included the
financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 14. These
financial statements and financial statement schedule are the
responsibility of the company's management. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on the financial statements and financial statement
schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted
auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform
the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made
by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for
our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Northrop
Grumman Corporation and Subsidiaries at December 31 for each of the
years 1990 through 1994, and the results of their operations and their
cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, such financial
statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic
consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in
all material respects the information set forth therein.
As discussed in the footnotes to the consolidated financial
statements, in 1991 the company changed its method of computing income
taxes by adopting Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No.
109 - Accounting for Income Taxes and its accounting for nonpension
benefit plans by adopting Financial Accounting Standards Board
Statement No. 106 - Employers' Accounting for Postretirement Benefits
Other Than Pensions.
Deloitte & Touche LLP
Los Angeles, California
February 15, 1995
NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure
No information is required in response to this Item.
PART III
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant
The information as to Directors will be incorporated herein by
reference to the Proxy Statement for the 1995 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company's
fiscal year.
The information as to Executive Officers is contained in Part I of
this report as permitted by General Instruction G(3).
Item 11. Executive Compensation
The information required by this Item will be incorporated herein
by reference to the Proxy Statement for the 1995 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company's
fiscal year.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and
Management
The information required by this Item will be incorporated herein
by reference to the Proxy Statement for the 1995 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company's
fiscal year.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
The information required by this Item will be incorporated herein
by reference to the Proxy Statement for the 1995 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company's
fiscal year.
NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION
PART IV
Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K
(a) 1. Financial Statements
Consolidated Statements of Financial Position
Consolidated Statements of Income
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Independent Auditors' Report
2. Financial Statement Schedule
Schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
All other schedules are omitted either because they are not
applicable or not required or because the required information is
included in the financial statements or notes thereto.
Separate financial statements of the parent company are omitted
since it is primarily an operating company and minority equity
interests in and/or nonguaranteed long-term debt of subsidiaries held
by others than the company are in amounts which together do not exceed
5 percent of the total consolidated assets at December 31, 1994.
NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION
Exhibits:
3(a) Certificate of Incorporation, as amended (incorporated by
reference to Form S-3 Registration Statement, filed August 18,
1994)
3(b) Northrop Grumman Corporation Bylaws, as amended (incorporated
by reference to Form S-3 Registration Statement, filed August
18, 1994).
4(a) Common Stock Purchase Rights Agreement (incorporated by
reference to Form 8-A filed September 22, 1988, amended on
August 2, 1991 (incorporated by reference to Form 8 filed
August 2, 1991) and amended on September 28, 1994 (incorporated
by reference to Form 8/A-A filed October 7, 1994).
4(b) Indenture Agreement dated as of October 15, 1994 (incorporated
by reference to Form 8-K filed October 25, 1994).
10(a) Northrop Grumman Corporation Amended and Restated Credit
Agreement dated as of April 15, 1994, as amended and restated
as of April 18, 1994 (incorporated by reference to Report on
Form 10-Q filed May 9, 1994), amended as of May 11, 1994, and
amended as of December 9, 1994.
10(b) Uncommitted Credit Facility dated October 10, 1994, between
Northrop Grumman Corporation and Wachovia Bank of Georgia,
N.A., which is substantially identical to facilities between
Northrop Grumman Corporation and certain banks some of which
are parties to the Credit Agreement filed as Exhibit (10)(a)
hereto.
*10(c) 1973 Incentive Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to
Form 8-B filed June 21, 1985).
*10(d) 1973 Performance Achievement Plan (incorporated by reference
to Form 8-B filed June 21, 1985).
*10(e) Northrop Supplemental Plan 2 (incorporated by reference to Form
10-K filed February 28, 1994)
*10(f) Northrop Corporation ERISA Supplemental Plan 1 (incorporated by
reference to Form 10-K filed February 28, 1994).
*10(g) Retirement Plan for Independent Outside Directors (incorporated
by reference to Form SE filed March 29, 1991), amended
September 21, 1994.
*10(h) 1987 Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended (incorporated by
reference to Form SE filed March 30, 1989).
*10(i) Deferred Compensation Arrangement under Performance Achievement
Plan (incorporated by reference to Form 8-B filed June 21,
1985).
*10(j) Supplemental Life Insurance Policy (incorporated by reference
to Form 8B filed June 21, 1985).
*10(k) Supplemental Accidental Death and Dismemberment Insurance
Policy (incorporated by reference to Form 8-B filed June 21,
1985).
*10(l) Supplemental Long-Term Disability Insurance Policy
(incorporated by reference to Form 8-B filed June 21, 1985).
*10(m) Supplemental Health Insurance Policy (incorporated by reference
to Form 8-B filed June 21, 1985).
*10(n) Supplemental Dental Insurance Policy (incorporated by reference
to Form 8-B filed June 21, 1985).
*10(o) Employment Agreement dated October 18, 1989 between Northrop
Corporation and Oliver C. Boileau, Jr. (incorporated by
reference to Form SE filed March 30, 1993), and Amended on May
15, 1994.
*10(p) Northrop Corporation 1993 Long-Term Incentive Stock Plan
(incorporated by reference to Northrop Corporation 1993 Proxy
Statement filed March 30, 1993).
*10(q) Northrop Corporation 1993 Stock Plan for Non-Employee Directors
(incorporated by reference to Northrop Corporation 1993 Proxy
Statement filed March 30, 1993), amended as of September 21,
1994.
*10(r) Northrop Corporation Special Severance Pay Agreement
(incorporated by reference to Northrop Corporation Report on
Form 10-K filed February 28, 1994.)
*10(s) Employment Agreement dated October 14, 1993 between Vought
Aircraft Company (acquired by Registrant in 1994) and Gordon L.
Williams.
*10(t) Executive Deferred Compensation Plan Design Outline and
Election Form executed by Kent Kresa on December 29, 1994.
*10(u) Northrop Grumman Transition Project Incentive Plan.
NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION
11 Statement Re Computation of Per Share Earnings
21 Significant subsidiaries of registrant
23 Independent Auditors' Consent
24 Power of Attorney
27 Financial data schedule
___________
* Listed as Exhibits pursuant to Item 601(b)(10) of Regulation S-K
(b) One Report on Form 8-K was filed during the last quarter of the
period covered by this report. The Report on Form 8-K was filed
October 25, 1994 in connection with the offer and sale by Northrop
Grumman Corporation of $600,000,000 aggregate principal amount of debt
securities consisting of 8-5/8% Notes due 2004 and 9-3/8% Debentures
due 2024.
NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be
signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on
the 20th day of March 1995.
Northrop Grumman Corporation
By: &&PINAZ2928
Nelson F. Gibbs
Corporate Vice President and Controller
(Principal Accounting Officer)
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
this report has been signed on behalf of the registrant this 20th day
of March 1995, by the following persons and in the capacities
indicated.
Signature Title
Kent Kresa* Chairman of the Board, President and
Chief Executive Officer and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
Jack R. Borsting* Director
John T. Chain, Jr.* Director
Jack Edwards* Director
Barbara C. Jordan* Director
Aulana L. Peters* Director
John E. Robson* Director
Richard R. Rosenberg* Director
William F. Schmied* Director
Brent Scowcroft* Director
John Brooks Slaughter* Director
Wallace C. Solberg* Director
Richard J. Stegemeier* Director
Richard B. Waugh, Jr.* Corporate Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer
*By: &&PINAD1368
Sheila M. Gibbons, Attorney-in-Fact
pursuant to a power of attorney
NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION
SCHEDULE II - VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
(Dollars in Thousands)
COL. A COL. B COL. C COL. D COL. E
Other
Balance at Changes-- Balance
Classification Beginning Additions Add at End
of Period At Cost (Deduct)(1) of Period
Description:
Year ended December 31, 1990
Reserves and allowances deducted
from asset accounts:
Allowances for doubtful
amounts $72,844 $27,862 $(18,625) $82,081
Year ended December 31, 1991
Reserves and allowances deducted
from asset accounts:
Allowances for doubtful
amounts $82,081 $ 8,900 $(38,980) $52,001
Year ended December 31, 1992
Reserves and allowances deducted
from asset accounts:
Allowances for doubtful
amounts $52,001 $ 7,571 $ (2,412) $57,160
Year ended December 31, 1993
Reserves and allowances deducted
from asset accounts:
Allowances for doubtful
amounts $57,160 $ 9,304 $ (9,759) $56,705
Year ended December 31, 1994
Reserves and allowances deducted
from asset accounts:
Allowances for doubtful
amounts $56,705 $25,283(2) $(18,262) $63,726
_____________
(1) Uncollectible amounts written off, net of recoveries.
(2) Additions include $15,625 of allowance for bad debts from acquired company.
NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION
EXHIBIT 11
STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
(in thousands, except per share)
Primary: 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990
Average shares outstanding 49,139 48,085 47,179 47,075 46,963
Net effect of the assumed exercise
of stock options - based on the
treasury stock method 758 792 251 187 1
Totals 49,897 48,877 47,430 47,262 46,964
Income before cumulative effect
of accounting principle changes $ 35,264 $ 95,755 $120,922 $268,256 $210,424
Cumulative effect on prior years of
changes in accounting principles:
Income Taxes 20,282
Retiree healthcare and life
insurance benefits (87,717)
Net Income $ 35,264 $ 95,755 $120,922 $200,821 $210,424
Earnings per share before
cumulative effect of accounting
principle changes $ .71 $ 1.96 $ 2.55 $ 5.68 $ 4.48
Cumulative effect on prior years
of change in accounting principles,
per share:
Income Taxes .43
Retiree healthcare and life
insurance benefits (1.86)
Earnings per share(1) $ .71 $ 1.96 $ 2.55 $ 4.25 $ 4.48
Fully diluted:
Average shares outstanding 49,139 48,085 47,179 47,075 46,963
Net effect of the assumed exercise
of stock options - based on the
treasury stock method 837 872 805 225 4
Totals 49,976 48,957 47,984 47,300 46,967
Income before cumulative effect
of accounting principle changes $ 35,264 $ 95,755 $120,922 $268,256 $210,424
Cumulative effect on prior years of
changes in accounting principles:
Income Taxes 20,282
Retiree health care and life
insurance benefits (87,717)
Net Income $ 35,264 $ 95,755 $120,922 $200,821 $210,424
Earnings per share before
cumulative effect of accounting
principle changes $ .71 $ 1.96 $ 2.52 $ 5.67 $ 4.48
Cumulative effect on prior years
of change in accounting principles,
per share:
Income Taxes .43
Retiree healthcare and life
insurance benefits (1.85)
Earnings per share(1) $ .71 $ 1.96 $ 2.52 $ 4.25 $ 4.48
_______________
(1) This calculation was made in compliance with Item 601 of Regulation S-K.
Earnings per share presented elsewhere in this report exclude from their
calculation shares issuable under employee stock options, since their
dilutive effect is less than 3%.
NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION
EXHIBIT 23
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT
We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements
Nos. 2-73293, 2-98614, 33-15764, 33-49667, 33-55141 and 33-55146 of
Northrop Grumman Corporation (formerly Northrop Corporation) on Form S-8
of our report dated February 15, 1995, appearing in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K of Northrop Grumman Corporation for the year ended
December 31, 1994.
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Los Angeles, California
March 20, 1995
Exhibit 10(a)
AMENDMENT NO. 1
AMENDMENT NO. 1 dated as of May 11, 1994, between
NORTHROP CORPORATION, a corporation duly organized and validly
existing under the laws of the State of Delaware (the "Company")
and each of the Banks party to the Credit Agreement referred to
below.
The Company, the Banks and the Administrative Agent are
parties to a Credit Agreement dated as of April 15, 1994, as
amended and restated as of April 18, 1994 (as heretofore modified
and supplemented and in effect on the date hereof, the "Credit
Agreement"), providing, subject to the terms and conditions
thereof, for loans to be made by said Banks to the Company in an
aggregate principal amount not exceeding $2,800,000,000. The
Company and the Banks wish to amend the Credit Agreement in
certain respects, and accordingly, the parties hereto hereby
agree as follows:
Section 1. DEFINITIONS. Except as otherwise defined
in this Amendment No. 1, terms defined in the Credit Agreement
are used herein as defined therein.
Section 2. AMENDMENTS. Subject to the satisfaction of
the conditions precedent specified in Section 4 below, but
effective as of the date of this Amendment No. 1, the Credit
Agreement shall be amended as follows:
Section 2.01. References in the Credit Agreement to
"this Agreement" and "the Notes" shall be deemed to be references
to the Credit Agreement as amended hereby, and to the Notes
(including the New Notes under and as defined in Section 4.02
hereof), respectively.
Section 2.02. Section 1.01 of the Credit Agreement
shall be amended by amending the following definitions to read in
their entirety as follows:
"Prime Rate" shall mean the arithmetic mean (rounded,
if necessary, to the nearest 1/16 of 1%), as determined by the
Administrative Agent, of the rate of interest from time to time
announced by each Reference Bank at its principal office as its
prime commercial lending rate.
"Revolving Credit Commitment" shall mean, for each
Revolving Credit Bank, the obligation of such Bank to make
Revolving Loans in an aggregate principal amount at any one time
outstanding up to but not exceeding the amount set opposite the
name of such Bank on Schedule I hereto under the caption
"Revolving Credit Commitment" (as the same may be reduced from
time to time pursuant to Section 2.04 hereof). The original
aggregate principal amount of the Revolving Credit Commitments is
$800,000,000.
"Term Loan Commitment" shall mean, for each Term Loan
Bank, the obligation of such Bank to make one or more Term Loans
in an aggregate amount up to but not exceeding the amount set
opposite the name of such Bank on Schedule I hereto under the
caption "Term Loan Commitment" (as the same may be reduced from
time to time pursuant to Section 2.04 hereof). The original
aggregate principal amount of the Term Loan Commitments is
$2,000,000,000.
"Term Loan Commitment Termination Date" shall mean
September 1, 1994.
Section 2.03. References in Section 3.01(c) of the
Credit Agreement to "$110,000,000" and "$220,000,000" are amended
to read as "$100,000,000" and "$200,000,000", respectively.
Section 2.04. Schedule I attached to the Credit
Agreement is deleted and Schedule I attached to this Amendment
No. 1. is substituted therefor.
Section 3. Representations and Warranties. The
Company represents and warrants to the Banks that the
representations and warranties set forth in Section 7 of the
Credit Agreement are true in all material respects on the date of
this Amendment No. 1 as if made on and as of the date of this
Amendment No. 1.
Section 4. Condition Precedent. As provided in
Section 2 above, the amendments to the Credit Agreement set forth
in said Section 2 shall become effective, as of the date of this
Amendment No. 1, upon the satisfaction of the following
conditions precedent:
4.01. Execution by All Parties. This Amendment No. 1
shall have been executed and delivered by the Company and each of
the Banks.
4.02. Notes. The Company shall have delivered to the
Administrative Agent for each Bank, in exchange for the Term Note
and Revolving Note heretofore delivered to such Bank pursuant to
Section 2.08(a) of the Credit Agreement, a new Term Note and a
new Revolving Note, each dated the date of the Notes being
exchanged, payable to such Bank in a principal amount equal to
the amount of the Term Loan Commitment and the Revolving Loan
Commitment, respectively, set forth opposite such Bank's name in
Schedule I attached hereto and otherwise duly completed, and each
of such Term Notes and Revolving Notes delivered to the Banks
shall constitute a "Note" under the Credit Agreement as amended
hereby.
Section 5. Miscellaneous. Except as herein provided,
the Credit Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full force and
effect. This Amendment No. 1 may be executed in any number of
counterparts, all of which taken together shall constitute one
and the same amendatory instrument and any of the parties hereto
may execute this Amendment No. 1 by signing any such counterpart.
This Amendment No. 1 shall be governed by, and construed in
accordance with, the law of the State of New York.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this
Amendment No. 1 to be duly executed and delivered as of the day
and year first above written.
NORTHROP CORPORATION
By___________________________
Title:
THE BANKS
THE CHASE MANHATTAN BANK
(NATIONAL ASSOCIATION)
By
Title:
CHEMICAL BANK
By
Title:
BANK OF AMERICA NATIONAL TRUST
AND SAVINGS ASSOCIATION
By____________________________
Title:
BANK OF MONTREAL
By__________________________
Title:
THE BANK OF NEW YORK
By___________________________
Title:
THE BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA
By_________________________
Title:
By_________________________
Title:
BANKERS TRUST COMPANY
By_______________________
Title:
CANADIAN IMPERIAL BANK OF
COMMERCE
By___________________________
Title:
CITICORP USA, INC.
By___________________________
Title:
CREDIT LYONNAIS CAYMANISLAND
BRANCH
By__________________________
Title:
THE FIRST NATIONAL BANK
OF CHICAGO
By_________________________
Title:
FIRST INTERSTATE BANK OF
CALIFORNIA
By_________________________
Title:
By_________________________
Title:
THE LONG-TERM CREDIT BANK OF
JAPAN, LTD., LOS ANGELES
AGENCY
By___________________________
Title:
NATIONSBANK OF TEXAS, N.A.
By_________________________
Title:
NATIONAL WESTMINSTER BANK PLC
LOS ANGELES OVERSEAS BRANCH
By___________________________
Title:
ROYAL BANK OF CANADA
By____________________________
Title:
SOCIETE GENERALE
By___________________________
Title:
CREDIT SUISSE
By_________________________
Title:
By_________________________
Title:
THE INDUSTRIAL BANK OF JAPAN,
LIMITED, LOS ANGELES AGENCY
By___________________________
Title:
NBD BANK, N.A.
By____________________________
Title:
THE SUMITOMO BANK, LIMITED
LOS ANGELES BRANCH
By___________________________
Title:
MORGAN GUARANTY TRUST COMPANY
OF NEW YORK
By___________________________
Title:
BANCO CENTRAL
HISPANOAMERICANO,
SAN FRANCISCO AGENCY
By___________________________
Title:
LLOYDS BANK PLC
By___________________________
Title:
MELLON BANK, N.A.
By_________________________
Title:
SHAWMUT BANK, N.A.
By___________________________
Title:
WACHOVIA BANK OF GEORGIA, N.A.
By___________________________
Title:
J.P. MORGAN DELAWARE
By____________________________
Title:
SCHEDULE I
TERM LOAN REVOLVING LOAN TOTAL
BANKS COMMITMENTS COMMITMENTS COMMITMENTS
The Chase Manhattan
Bank (National Assn) $96,428,571.47 $38,571,428.53 $135,000,000
Chemical Bank 96,428,571.46 38,571,428.54 135,000,000
Bank of American National
Trust and Savings Assn 85,714,285.71 34,285,714.29 120,000,000
Bank of Montreal 85,714,285.71 34,285,714.29 120,000,000
The Bank of New York 85,714,285.71 34,285,714.29 120,000,000
The Bank of Nova Scotia 85,714,285.71 34,285,714.29 120,000,000
Bankers Trust Company 85,714,285.71 34,285,714.29 120,000,000
Canadian Imperial Bank of
Commerce 85,714,285.71 34,285,714.29 120,000,000
Citicorp USA, Inc. 85,714,285.71 34,285,714.29 120,000,000
Credit Lyonnais
Cayman Island Branch 85,714,285.71 34,285,714.29 120,000,000
First National Bank
of Chicago 85,714,285.71 34,285,714.29 120,000,000
First Interstate Bank of
California 85,714,285.71 34,285,714.29 120,000,000
The Long-Term Credit Bank
of Japan, Lts., Los
Angeles Agency 85,714,285.71 34,285,714.29 120,000,000
NationsBank of Texas,
N.A. 85,714,285.71 34,285,714.29 120,000,000
National Westminster Bank
Plc Los Angeles
Overseas Branch 85,714,285.71 34,285,714.29 120,000,000
Royal Bank of Canada 85,714,285.71 34,285,714.29 120,000,000
Societe Generale 85,714,285.71 34,285,714.29 120,000,000
Credit Suisse 64,285,714.29 25,714,285.71 90,000,000
The Industrial Bank of
Japan, Limited, Los
Angeles Agency 64,285,714.29 25,714,285.71 90,000,000
NBD Nank, N.A. 64,285,714.29 25,714,285.71 90,000,000
The Sumitomo Bank,
Limited, Los Angeles
Branch 64,285,714.29 25,714,285.71 90,000,000
Morgan Guaranty Trust
Company of New York 57,142,857.14 22,857,142.86 80,000,000
Banco Central Hispano-
americano, San Fran-
cisco Agency 35,714,285.71 14,285,714.29 50,000,000
Lloyds Bank Plc 35,714,285.71 14,285,714.29 50,000,000
Mellon Bank, N.A. 35,714,285.71 14,285,714.29 50,000,000
Shawmut Bank, N.A. 35,714,285.71 14,285,714.29 50,000,000
Wachovia Bank of
Georgia, N.A. 35,714,285.71 14,285,714.29 50,000,000
J.P. Morgan Delaware 28,571,428.57 11,428,571.43 40,000,000
TOTAL $2,000,000,000 $800,000,000 $2,800,000,000
NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION
AMENDMENT NO. 2
Dated as of December 9, 1994
TO
AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT AGREEMENT
Dated as of April 15, 1994
Amended and Restated as of April 18, 1994
$1,800,000,000
THE CHASE MANHATTAN BANK (NATIONAL ASSOCIATION)
CHEMICAL BANK
BANK OF AMERICA NATIONAL TRUST AND SAVINGS ASSOCIATION
MORGAN GUARANTY TRUST COMPANY OF NEW YORK,
as Co-Agents
THE CHASE MANHATTAN BANK (NATIONAL ASSOCIATION),
as Administrative Agent
AMENDMENT NO. 2 dated as of December 9, 1994, between
NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION (formerly named Northrop
Corporation), a corporation duly organized and validly existing
under the laws of the State of Delaware (the "Company") and each
of the Banks party to the Credit Agreement referred to below.
The Company, the Banks and the Administrative Agent are
parties to an Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of
April 15, 1994, as amended and restated as of April 18, 1994 (as
heretofore modified and supplemented and in effect on the date
hereof, the "Credit Agreement"), providing, subject to the terms
and conditions thereof, for loans to be made by said Banks to the
Company in an aggregate principal amount not exceeding
$2,800,000,000. Pursuant to Section 2.01.A.(a) of the Credit
Agreement, the Company borrowed $2,000,000,000 of the Term Loans,
$1,000,000,000 of which has been prepaid and $1,000,000,000 is
the aggregate remaining balance of the Term Loans. The Company
and the Banks wish to amend the Credit Agreement in certain
respects, and accordingly, the parties hereto hereby agree as
follows:
Section 1. Definitions. Except as otherwise defined
in this Amendment No. 2, terms defined in the Credit Agreement
are used herein as defined therein.
Section 2. Amendments. Subject to the satisfaction of
the conditions precedent specified in Section 4 below, but
effective as of the date of this Amendment No. 2, the Credit
Agreement shall be amended as follows:
Section 2.01. References in the Credit Agreement to
"this Agreement" shall be deemed to be references to the Credit
Agreement as amended hereby.
Section 2.02. Section 1.01 of the Credit Agreement
shall be amended by adding the following definitions in their
appropriate alphabetic order:
"Amendment No. 2" shall mean Amendment No. 2 dated as
of December 9, 1994 to this Agreement.
"Special Charges" shall mean pre-tax non-cash charges
to income on or before June 30, 1996 up to but not exceeding
$500,000,000 in the aggregate in connection with (i) the
Company's early retirement incentive program implemented on
October 1, 1994 and (ii) the sale or intended sale of plant
and equipment.
Section 2.03. Section 1.01 of the Credit Agreement
shall be amended by amending the following definitions to read in
their entirety as follows:
"Applicable Facility Fee Rate" with respect to the
Revolving Credit Commitments, and "Applicable Margin" for
each Type of Syndicated Loan, shall mean: (a) during the
period from the date Amendment No. 2 becomes effective to
December 31, 1994, (i) the Applicable Facility Fee Rate
shall be 0.1750%, (ii) the Revolving Loan Applicable Margin
for Base Rate Loans shall be 0% and for Eurodollar Loans
shall be 0.2500% and (iii) the Term Loan Applicable Margin
for Base Rate Loans shall be 0% and for Eurodollar Loans
shall be 0.4250%, and (b) during each Quarterly Period
occurring after December 31, 1994, provided that the
Administrative Agent shall have received (i) the financial
statements described in Section 8.01 hereof as at and for
the fiscal period ending on the preceding Quarterly Date and
(ii) the certificate required to be delivered under
Section 8.01(h) hereof, the respective rates set forth below
opposite the range of the Leverage Ratio set forth below
which encompasses the Leverage Ratio set forth in such
certificate delivered under Section 8.01(h) hereof
(provided, further, that if the Company shall fail to
deliver such financial statements and certificate, the
"Applicable Facility Fee Rate" with respect to the Revolving
Credit Commitments, and the "Applicable Margin" for each
Type of Syndicated Loan, during such Quarterly Period shall
be determined as if the relevant Leverage Ratio were greater
than 65%):
REVOLVING CREDIT COMMITMENTS TERM LOAN COMMITMENTS
APPLICABLE MARGIN APPLICABLE MARGIN
Applicable
Range of Facility Base Rate Eurodollar Base Rate Eurodollar
Leverage Ratio Fee Rate Loan Loan Loan Loan
Greater than 0.2250% 0% 0.3750% 0% 0.6000%
or equal to 65%
Less than 65% 0.1750% 0% 0.2500% 0% 0.4250%
but greater than
or equal to 50%
Less than 50% 0.1250% 0% 0.2250% 0% 0.3500%
but greater than
or equal to 40%
Less than 40% 0.1000% 0% 0.2000% 0% 0.3000%
but greater than
or equal to 30%
Less than 30% 0.0850% 0% 0.1650% 0% 0.2500%
provided that, during any period that the Company does not have
senior unsecured long term public debt that is rated at least
Baa3 or BBB-, respectively, by Moody's Investors Service, Inc.
(or any successor thereto) or by Standard & Poor's Ratings Group
(or any successor thereto), the Applicable Facility Fee Rate
shall be 0.3000% and the Applicable Margin for Eurodollar Loans
shall be 0.7000% for Revolving Loans and 1.0000% for Term Loans.
"Consolidated Shareholders' Equity" shall mean the
amount of shareholders' equity of the Company and the
Subsidiaries (determined on a consolidated basis
without duplication in accordance with GAAP) plus the
cumulative after-tax reduction in consolidated net
income of the Company and the Subsidiaries resulting
from Special Charges.
"Net Income" shall mean, for the Company and the
Subsidiaries (determined on a consolidated basis without
duplication in accordance with GAAP) for any fiscal period,
an amount equal to the consolidated net income for, but
before being reduced by the after-tax effect of any Special
Charges taken in, such fiscal period.
"Principal Payment Dates" shall mean the Quarterly
Dates falling on or nearest to March 31, June 30,
September 30 and December 31 of each year, commencing with
September 30, 1995 through and including March 31, 1999.
Section 2.04. Section 2.10(b) of the Credit Agreement
shall be amended by revising the first parenthetical therein to
read in its entirety as follows: "(other than (x) the Loans and
(y) borrowings under unsecured short-term credit lines)".
Section 2.05. Section 3.01(c) of the Credit Agreement
shall be amended to read in its entirety as follows:
"(c) The Company hereby promises to pay to the
Administrative Agent for account of the Banks the aggregate
principal amount of the Term Loans outstanding on the
effective date of Amendment No. 2 in 15 consecutive
quarterly installments payable on the Principal Payment
Dates, each of the first 14 installments being in the
aggregate amount of $62,500,000 and the last installment
being in the aggregate amount of $125,000,000; provided
that, if after the effective date of Amendment No. 2 the
Company repays the Refinanced Indebtedness of Grumman in
full, then (i) first, the remaining installments shall be
reduced by an amount equal to the amount of such repayment
in the direct order of their maturity and (ii) then the
remaining installments (after giving effect to the
reductions referred to in clause (i)) shall be increased
ratably by an aggregate amount equal to the amount of such
repayment."
Section 2.06. Section 8.08 of the Credit Agreement
shall be amended by revising clause (b) thereof to read in its
entirety as follows: "the cumulative sum of 50% of Net Income
for each fiscal quarter of the Company (for which purpose Net
Income that is not a positive number for any such fiscal quarter
shall be deemed to be Net Income of zero) commencing with the
fiscal quarter ending on March 31, 1994 (determined on a
consolidated basis without duplication in accordance with GAAP)".
Section 2.07. Section 8.09 of the Credit Agreement
shall be amended by changing the percentage "30%" appearing
therein to "40%".
Section 2.08. Section 8.10 of the Credit Agreement
shall be amended by deleting the word "unless" appearing in
clause (a) thereof and substituting therefor the words "so long
as".
Section 2.09. Section 8.12(c) of the Credit Agreement
shall be amended by deleting the parenthetical appearing therein.
Section 2.10. Section 10.10 of the Credit Agreement
shall be amended to read in its entirety as follows:
"10.10 Co-Agents. The Co-Agents identified on the
front page of this Agreement or of any amendment thereto
shall have no duties or responsibilities hereunder other
than as Banks hereunder or, in the case of Chase, as
Administrative Agent."
Section 3. Representations and Warranties. The
Company represents and warrants to the Banks that the
representations and warranties set forth in Section 7 of the
Credit Agreement are true in all material respects on the date of
this Amendment No. 2 as if made on and as of the date of this
Amendment No. 2.
Section 4. Condition Precedent. As provided in
Section 2 above, the amendments to the Credit Agreement set forth
in said Section 2 shall become effective, as of the date of this
Amendment No. 2, upon this Amendment No. 2 being executed and
delivered by the Company and each of the Banks and consented to
by Grumman Corporation.
Section 5. Miscellaneous. Except as herein provided,
the Credit Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full force and
effect. This Amendment No. 2 may be executed in any number of
counterparts, all of which taken together shall constitute one
and the same amendatory instrument and any of the parties hereto
may execute this Amendment No. 2 by signing any such counterpart.
This Amendment No. 2 shall be governed by, and construed in
accordance with, the law of the State of New York.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this
Amendment No. 2 to be duly executed and delivered as of the day
and year first above written.
NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION
By___________________________
Title:
THE BANKS
THE CHASE MANHATTAN BANK
(NATIONAL ASSOCIATION)
By____________________________
Title:
CHEMICAL BANK
By__________________________
Title:
BANK OF AMERICA NATIONAL TRUST
AND SAVINGS ASSOCIATION
By____________________________
Title:
BANK OF MONTREAL
By__________________________
Title:
THE BANK OF NEW YORK
By___________________________
Title:
THE BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA
By_________________________
Title:
By_________________________
Title:
BANKERS TRUST COMPANY
By_______________________
Title:CANADIAN IMPERIAL BANK OF
COMMERCE
By___________________________
Title:
CITICORP USA, INC.
By___________________________
Title:
CREDIT LYONNAIS CAYMAN ISLAND
BRANCH
By__________________________
Title:
THE FIRST NATIONAL BANK
OF CHICAGO
By_________________________
Title:
FIRST INTERSTATE BANK OF
CALIFORNIA
By_________________________
Title:
By_________________________
Title:
THE LONG-TERM CREDIT BANK OF
JAPAN, LTD., LOS ANGELES
AGENCY
By___________________________
Title:
NATIONSBANK OF TEXAS, N.A.
By_________________________
Title:
NATIONAL WESTMINSTER BANK PLC
LOS ANGELES OVERSEAS BRANCH
By___________________________
Title:
ROYAL BANK OF CANADA
By____________________________
Title:
SOCIETE GENERALE
By___________________________
Title:
CREDIT SUISSE
By_________________________
Title:
By_________________________
Title:
THE INDUSTRIAL BANK OF JAPAN,
LIMITED, LOS ANGELES AGENCY
By___________________________
Title:
NBD BANK, N.A.
By____________________________
Title:
THE SUMITOMO BANK, LIMITED
LOS ANGELES BRANCH
By___________________________
Title:
MORGAN GUARANTY TRUST COMPANY
OF NEW YORK
By___________________________
Title:
BANCO CENTRAL
HISPANOAMERICANO,
SAN FRANCISCO AGENCY
By___________________________
Title:
LLOYDS BANK PLC
By___________________________
Title:
MELLON BANK, N.A.
By_________________________
Title:
SHAWMUT BANK, N.A.
By___________________________
Title:
WACHOVIA BANK OF GEORGIA, N.A.
By___________________________
Title:
J.P. MORGAN DELAWARE
By____________________________
Title:
CONSENT:
GRUMMAN CORPORATION TORONTO DOMINION (TEXAS) INC.
By___________________________ By___________________________
Title:
DRESDNER BANK AG,
LOS ANGELES AGENCY AND
GRAND CAYMEN BRANCH
By___________________________
Title:
By___________________________
Title:
EXHIBIT 10(b)
PROMISSORY NOTE
$25,000,000.00 October 10, 1994
FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned, NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION
(the "Borrower"), hereby promises to pay to the order of Wachovia
Bank of Georgia, N.A. (the "Bank"), or any branch, office, or agency
of the Bank, the lesser of:
(a) the principal sum of U.S. $25,000,000.00 ; or
(b) the aggregate unpaid principal amount of all Advances made by
the Bank to the Borrower and endorsed on the reverse of this
Note and made a part hereof.
Such principal amount shall be due and payable, with respect to any
Advance, on the earlier of (a) the maturity date of such Advance or
(b) one (1) business day following the date on which the Bank makes
demand for payment hereunder. The Borrower promises to pay interest
(computed for the actual number of days elapsed on the basis of a
year of 360 days, which results in greater interest than if a 365 day
year were used) in respect of the unpaid principal amount hereof from
the date of each Advance until paid, at such rates as shall be agreed
upon from time to time between the Borrower and the Bank and endorsed
on the reverse hereof. Interest shall be payable at the maturity of
each Advance and calculated as to each interest period from and
including the first day thereof, but not including the last day
thereof. Interest not paid when due shall thereafter bear like
interest as the principal.
The Bank is authorized and directed to endorse on the reverse hereof
the date, amount, interest rate, and maturity date of each Advance
made by the Bank to the Borrower hereunder, as well as the date and
the amount of each payment of the principal amount of, and interest
on, such Advances; provided, however, that the failure by the Bank to
make such endorsement shall not relieve the Borrower of any of its
obligations hereunder.
Both principal and interest are payable in lawful money of the United
States of America at the office of the Bank located at 191 Peachtree
Street, Atlanta, Georgia, 30303 .
The Borrower promises to pay the cost of collection, including
reasonable attorney's fees (including, without limitation, the
reasonable estimate of the allocated cost of in-house legal staff and
counsel).
The makers and endorsers severally waive presentment of the payment,
protest, notice of protest, and notice of non-payment of this Note.
This Note and the rights and obligations of the parties hereunder
shall be construed in accordance with and governed by the laws of the
State of California.
NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION
By: ________________________
James L. Sanford
Assistant Treasurer
EXHIBIT 10(g)
AMENDMENT TO
NORTHROP CORPORATION
BOARD OF DIRECTORS RETIREMENT PLAN
This amendment to the Northrop Corporation Board of Directors
Retirement Plan is intended to reflect the name change of
Northrop Corporation to Northrop Grumman Corporation and to add a
change of control provision:
1. The name of the Plan shall be amended, to reflect the name
change of Northrop Corporation to Northrop Grumman Corporation,
as follows:
Northrop Grumman Corporation Board of Directors Retirement Plan
2. A new subsection 1.12 shall be added as follows:
1.12 "Change of Control" shall have the meaning set forth in
Section 4.04.
3. A new subsection 4.04 shall be added as follows:
4.04 VESTING OF BENEFIT
In the event of a Change of Control, all Outside Directors
serving on the Board of Directors at the time of the Change of
Control shall be immediately vested and entitled to an Annual
Benefit Amount for each year (or if less than one year, for each
fraction of a year to the nearest quarter) of consecutive
service. For purposes of this Plan, Change of Control herein
shall be deemed to have occurred if any of the following events
occur:
(1) any "person," as such term is used in Sections 13(d)(3) and
14(d)(2) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
("Exchange Act") or any successor provisions, other than a
trustee or other fiduciary holding securities under the Plan or
any other employee benefit plan of the Company or an Affiliate,
becomes the "beneficial owner" (as defined in Rule 13d-3 under
the Exchange Act or any successor provision), directly or
indirectly, of securities of the Company representing fifteen
percent (15%) or more of the combined voting power of the
Company's then outstanding securities (unless the event causing
the fifteen (15%) threshold to be crossed is an acquisition of
securities directly from the Company).
(2) during any period of two consecutive years (not including
any period prior to the adoption of this Trust Agreement),
individuals who at the beginning of such period constitute the
Board of Directors of the Company ("the Board"), and any new
director (other than a director designated by a person who has
entered into an agreement with the Company to effect a
transaction described in paragraph (1) or (3) of this paragraph
(d)) whose nomination by the Board or election by the Company's
shareholders was approved by a vote of at least two-thirds (2/3)
of the directors then still in office who either were directors
at the beginning of the period or whose election or nomination
for election was previously so approved (the "Continuing
Directors"), cease for any reason to constitute at least a
majority thereof.
(3) the shareholders of the Company approve a merger or
consolidation of the Company with any other corporation, other
than a merger or consolidation which would result in the voting
securities of the Company outstanding immediately prior thereto
continuing to represent (either by remaining outstanding or by
being converted into voting securities of the surviving entity)
at least 80% of the combined voting power of the voting
securities of the Company or such surviving entity outstanding
immediately after such merger or consolidation.
(4) the shareholders of the Company approve a plan of complete
liquidation of the Company or an agreement for the sale or
disposition of the Company of all or substantially all of the
Company's assets.
Transactions described in this paragraph 4.04 shall not
constitute Changes in Control if, immediately prior to the change
in ownership, merger, consolidation, sale or other disposition,
liquidation or change in the Board, the Board shall pass
resolution approved by a vote of the majority of the Continuing
Directors to the effect that it has determined that such
transaction does not constitute a Change in Control within the
intention of this paragraph 4.04. In addition, for purposes of
this paragraph 4.04, if a Change in Control has occurred, no
subsequent event shall result in another Change in Control.
EXHIBIT 10(o)
FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
1. PARTIES: The parties to this First Amendment to
Employment Agreement ("Amendment") are Northrop Corporation
("Northrop") and Oliver C. Boileau ("Executive").
2. RECITALS: This Amendment is made with reference to the
following facts:
2.1 On October 18, 1989 Northrop and Executive entered into
an Employment Agreement ("Agreement"), a copy of which is attached
hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference.
2.2 Pursuant to the terms of the Agreement, Executive was
employed by Northrop to serve as the President and General Manager
of Northrop's B-2 Division from December 11, 1989 to December 10,
1994.
2.3 Northrop has recently acquired the Grumman Corporation
("Grumman"), and now wishes Executive to serve as President of
Grumman effective immediately.
2.4 Northrop wishes to provide certain additional benefits to
Executive in consideration for his agreement to serve in this
critical new assignment.
2.5 Accordingly, subject to the approval of Northrop's Board
of Directors, the parties hereby agree to amend the Agreement,
pursuant to Section 12 thereof, in accordance with the amendments
set forth below.
3. TERM: Section 2 of the Agreement is hereby amended to
extend the expiration date of the Agreement from December 10, 1994
to and including January 31, 1995.
4. POSITION AND DUTIES: Section 3 of the Agreement is hereby
amended by adding the following sentence at the end thereof:
"For the period April 19, 1994 through January 31, 1995,
Executive shall serve as President of Grumman in addition to
his other job duties."
5. SALARY: Section 4 of the Agreement is hereby amended by
adding the following sentence at the end thereof:
"For the period April 19, 1994 through January 31, 1995,
Executive shall be paid a base salary of $41,667 per month,
equivalent to $500,000 per year."
6. LONG TERM INCENTIVE PLAN: Section 6 of the Agreement is
hereby amended by adding the following sentence at the end thereof:
"In consideration for his acceptance of the Grumman
assignment, Northrop's management shall recommend to the
Northrop Board of Directors that Executive receive 15,000
Northrop stock options pursuant to the terms of Northrop's
1993 Long Term Incentive Stock Plan, with all of the options
to vest on January 31, 1995."
7. NEW SECTION: The Agreement is hereby amended by adding
the following new Section 8.5 immediately following Section 8,
"Housing Assistance":
"8.5 SPECIAL HOUSING AND EXPENSE PROVISIONS FOR GRUMMAN
ASSIGNMENT: In consideration of Executive's acceptance of the
Grumman assignment, he will be provided with the following
special benefits:
8.5.1 Northrop will purchase Executive's home in Long Beach,
California for $1,025,000 in accordance with the valuation
determined by the Los Angeles County Assessor for 1993.
8.5.2 Northrop will provide Executive with a furnished
condominium or town house in the Long Island area at
Northrop's expense through January 31, 1995.
8.5.3 It is anticipated that Executive will arrange for the
transportation of his household goods and automobiles from his
current home in Long Beach to locations in Wyoming and St.
Louis, Missouri prior to May 31, 1994. Northrop will
reimburse Executive for the actual and reasonable cost of
transporting these goods, as well as for transporting certain
personal effects to Long Island. In addition, Northrop will
reimburse Executive for the actual and reasonable cost
incurred by him for storing household goods in St. Louis and
Wyoming through January 31, 1995.
8.5.4 Executive will be provided with an automobile in Long
Island at Northrop's expense through January 31, 1995. At
Northrop's option, it will either pay to transport Executive's
current company provided automobile to Long Island or lease a
comparable automobile for him.
8.5.5 It is anticipated that Executive may be required to
stay at a hotel for a short period of time prior to moving
into the Northrop provided condominium or town house. In such
event, Northrop will reimburse Executive for actual and
reasonable living expenses.
8.5.6 Northrop will reimburse Executive for the following
miscellaneous costs incurred by him in connection with his
Grumman assignment:
(i) the differential between the state and local income taxes
paid by him for tax year 1994 as a result of this assignment
and those which would have been paid by him had he remained in
California. This differential shall be provided to Executive
on a "grossed up" basis, with the "grossed up" amount to be
based on the highest statutory tax rate for each jurisdiction.
(ii) actual and reasonable accounting fees incurred by
Executive for preparing his 1994 California, New York and
federal tax returns.
(iii) actual and reasonable costs for the connection of
utility services (telephone, gas, electric, water, and cable
television) at the condominium or town house to be provided to
Executive.
(iv) actual and reasonable monthly utility costs incurred by
Executive at the Northrop provided condominium or town house
for telephone, gas, electric, water, and cable television."
DATED:____________________ OLIVER C. BOILEAU
By________________________________________
DATED:____________________ NORTHROP CORPORATION
By_____________________________
Marvin Elkin
Corporate Vice President and Chief Human
Resources and Administrative Officer
EXHIBIT 10(q)
STOCK PLAN FOR AMENDMENT TO 1993 NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS
8. Grants
The annual cash retainer payable to each Eligible Director for
services as a director, excluding any fees payable for meetings
of the Board or Board committees or for extraordinary services,
shall be payable partly in shares of common stock as provided
under the Plan. Accordingly, for Plan purposes only, the amount
of the annual retainer payable to each Eligible Director in cash
shall be reduced by 30%. As soon as practicable, but no later
than 30 days following the end of each calendar year of the Plan,
each Eligible Director shall automatically be granted a number of
shares of common stock having a Fair Market Value equal to 30% of
the annual retainer earned for the prior year ("stock retainer
portion"). Notwithstanding the foregoing, for the first calendar
year of the Plan in which the amount of the annual retainer
payable in cash or stock is adjusted, each Eligible Director
shall receive an adjusted payment in shares under this Section 8
as is appropriate.
EXHIBIT 10(s)
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
This Agreement is entered into effective as of October 14,
1993, by and between Vought Aircraft Company, a Delaware
corporation ("Vought"), and Gordon L. Williams ("Williams"), an
individual residing in Tarrant County, Texas.
WHEREAS, Vought desires to continue to employ Williams and
Williams desires to continue to be employed by Vought upon the
terms and conditions set forth herein;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and mutual
covenants contained herein, it is agreed as follows:
1. Employment
Vought hereby offers to continue to employ Williams as
President and Chief Executive Officer, and Williams hereby
accepts continued employment by Vought, upon the terms and
conditions herein set forth.
2. Term
The term of this Agreement shall commence as of October
14, 1993, and, subject to the provisions of paragraph 6 below,
shall expire on January 1, 1996, unless sooner terminated as
hereinafter set forth.
3. Duties
Williams will, during the term hereof:
(a) Faithfully and diligently do and perform all such
acts and duties and furnish such services as the Board of
Directors of VAC Acquisition Corp., parent company of Vought
("VAC Board"), or the Board of Directors of Vought ("Vought
Board") shall direct, and do and perform all acts in the
ordinary course of Vought's business (within such limits as
the VAC Board or the Vought Board may prescribe) necessary
and conducive to Vought's best interests; and
(b) Devote his full time, energy and skill to the
business of Vought and to the promotion of Vought's best
interests, except for vacations and absences made necessary
because of illness.
4. Compensation
(a) Subject to the provisions of subparagraph 4(b) and
paragraph 5 below, Vought shall pay to Williams for all
services to be performed by him during the term of this
Agreement: (i) a fixed salary at the rate of $309,276.00
per annum through December 31, 1993, and $420,000.00 per
annum effective January 1, 1994, payable in periodic
payments in accordance with Vought's practices for other
executive and managerial employees, as such practices may be
determined from time to time. The Vought Board (or its
delegate) or VAC Board (or its delegate), as the case may
be, will review such fixed salary annually and, in its
discretion, may grant increases thereof based upon Williams'
performance; and (ii) any additional incentive compensation
under the Vought Aircraft Variable Incentive Compensation
Plan or any successor or replacement plan ("Variable
Compensation Plan") as the VAC Board (or its delegate) in
its discretion may from time to time determine. Williams
shall be assigned a target level of 60% for purposes of the
Variable Compensation Plan, which target level may be
increased by the VAC Board (or its delegate) in its
discretion.
All such payments will be subject to such
deductions as may be required to be made pursuant to law,
government regulation or order, or by agreement with, or
consent of, Williams.
(b) If Williams incurs a disability during the term of
this Agreement which would make him eligible to receive the
disability benefits provided for under the Vought Aircraft
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan and Vought's
disability income plan, then the payment of Williams' fixed
salary pursuant to subparagraph 4(a) above shall be
suspended for the period of time during which Williams
remains entitled to the payment of such disability benefits.
Williams' fixed salary and/or incentive
compensation payable pursuant to subparagraph 4(a) above
shall be reduced by the amount of any annuity payments made
to Williams during the term of this Agreement under the
Vought Aircraft Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, in
the manner determined by the Compensation Committee of the
VAC Board (or its successor) in its sole and absolute
discretion.
(c) In addition to the payments set forth above,
Vought agrees that during the term of this Agreement: (i)
Williams shall continue to be a participant in the Vought
Aircraft Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (or any
successor or replacement plan with substantially identical
benefits); (ii) Williams shall be entitled to participate in
any group life insurance, medical, dental, disability,
vacation, pension, profit sharing or other employee benefit
plan, compensation program, or perquisites maintained by
Vought during the term of this Agreement and which is
available to officers of Vought, but excluding, however, the
LTV Key Employee Retention Plan and the Vought Key Employee
Retention Plan; and (iii) Williams shall be entitled to
reimbursement by Vought for all reasonable expenses actually
and necessarily incurred by him on its behalf in the course
of his employment hereunder.
5. Termination
(a) If Williams' employment with Vought shall
terminate for "cause," or due to death, retirement or
voluntary termination (except for "good reason" as defined
in subparagraph (b) below), then all obligations of Vought
hereunder shall terminate; provided, however, that any
portion of Williams' fixed salary pursuant to subparagraph
4(a) above which is earned but unpaid as of the date of
death shall be paid to the duly appointed personal
representative of Williams' estate; and further provided,
however, that participation in the Vought Aircraft Salaried
Health Care Plan (or any successor or replacement plan) as
amended from time to time, shall be continued for the
remainder of the lives of Williams and Williams' legally
recognized spouse on the effective date of this Agreement.
For purposes of this Agreement, "cause" shall be deemed to
exist upon (i) the willful and continued failure by Williams
to perform substantially the duties of his position (other
than any actual or anticipated failure resulting from
termination by Williams for "good reason") or (ii) the
willful engaging by Williams in conduct which is
demonstrably injurious to Vought, monetarily or otherwise.
Solely for purposes of determining "cause," an act or
failure to act by Williams shall be deemed "willful" if
done, or omitted to be done, by him in bad faith and without
reasonable belief that such act or omission was in the best
interest of Vought. The Executive Committee of the VAC
Board shall have the sole discretion to determine in good
faith whether the conditions constituting a termination for
cause have occurred.
(b) In the event of (i) a reduction in Williams' fixed
salary and/or target level percentage established pursuant
to subparagraph 4(a), (ii) a material adverse alteration or
diminution of Williams' position, duties, responsibilities,
reporting relationships, authority or status (including
corresponding perquisites) from those in effect, or
otherwise accorded to Williams, on the effective date of
this Agreement, or (iii) the failure of Vought to obtain an
agreement from any successor to expressly assume and agree
(by an instrument in writing) to perform the obligations to
Williams under this Agreement, any of which occurs without
the express written consent of Williams, then Williams shall
have the right to terminate employment with Vought for "good
reason" and thereby be entitled to the benefits described in
subparagraph 5(c) below.
(c) If Williams' employment with Vought shall
terminate for "good reason" as described in subparagraph (b)
above, or other than for cause, retirement or voluntary
termination (except for "good reason"), or death, then
Williams shall be entitled to (i) payment of any portion
of his fixed salary established pursuant to subparagraph
4(a) which is earned but unpaid as of the date of
termination; (ii) continued payment of Williams' then
current base salary increased by that percentage equal to
150% of Williams' then current target level percentage
under the Variable Compensation Plan, in substantially equal
amounts payable in arrears at regular payroll intervals
through the earlier of (A) the end of the 12-month period
following termination of employment, or (B) the Expiration
Date, and thereafter Williams' then current base salary
increased by that percentage equal to Williams' then current
target level percentage under the Variable Compensation
Plan, in substantially equal amounts payable in arrears at
regular payroll intervals through the Expiration Date,
provided, however, that such payments shall abate (x) to the
extent of any and all compensation earned by Williams in the
course of employment with a subsequent employer (including
self-employment which commences subsequent to Williams'
termination of employment), without regard to the time of
payment of such compensation, and (y) in their entirety as
of Williams' date of death, except that any payment for the
payroll period in which Williams dies shall be prorated
through such date of death; (iii) continued participation in
the Vought Aircraft Salaried Health Care Plan (or any
successor or replacement plan) as amended from time to time,
for the remainder of the lives of Williams and Williams'
legally recognized spouse on the effective date of this
Agreement; (iv) continued participation in the Vought
Aircraft Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (or any
successor or replacement plan with substantially identical
benefits) through January 1, 1996, including the purchase of
annuities from time to time pursuant to the terms of such
plan; and (v) continued participation in any life insurance
plan, health care plan, and health care flexible spending
account maintained from time to time by Vought to the same
extent and at the same level of participant contributions
("Employee Cost"), if any, as if Williams had not had a
termination of employment (or if such participation is not
possible under the terms of any such plan, Williams shall be
provided by Vought with benefits or a cash payment or
payments sufficient to enable him to obtain benefits which
are comparable to the coverage provided by such plan, in
each case subject to payment by Williams of the Employee
Cost) until Williams becomes eligible for benefits under any
employee welfare benefit plan(s), as defined in Section 3(1)
of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as
amended, in connection with new employment, or until January
1, 1996, if earlier.
6. Consulting Services
(a) Upon termination of Williams' employment for
reasons other than "cause" or death, Vought at its sole
discretion may retain Williams as an independent consultant,
and not as an employee, for the period of twelve consecutive
months following termination of employment ("Consulting
Period").
(b) During the Consulting Period:
(i) Williams will devote his best efforts to his
position as an independent consultant and will faithfully
perform such duties as determined by the Vought Board or the
VAC Board. Williams will render to Vought such services of
an advisory or consultative nature as Vought may reasonably
request, so that Vought may continue to have the benefit of
Williams' experience and special knowledge of the affairs of
Vought and of Williams' reputation and contacts.
(ii) During the Consulting Period, Williams will
neither serve as a consultant to nor as an employee,
officer, director or agent of any person, firm or
corporation who is in competition with Vought without the
prior written consent of Vought as given through the Vought
Board, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld.
(c) Williams will be available for advice and counsel
to the officers and directors of Vought at all reasonable
times by telephone, letter, or, upon receipt of five days'
written notice from Vought, in person; provided, however,
Williams shall neither be obligated to render in excess of 5
days of service during any month, nor in excess of 60 days
of service during the entire Consulting Period. Williams
shall not be obligated to render any consulting services
during any period when he is unable to do so due to illness,
disability or injury, and Williams' inability to do so shall
not affect his right to receive the compensation described
in subparagraph 6(d) below during the Consulting Period.
(d) Vought agrees to pay Williams for rendering
consulting services and for merely being available to render
services hereunder, at the rate of $10,000 per month through
the earlier of (i) the end of the Consulting Period, or (ii)
the date of Williams' death, except that any payment for the
period in which Williams dies shall be prorated through such
date of death.
(e) Williams shall be entitled to reimbursement during
the Consulting Period for all reasonable and customary
expenses actually incurred by him in the performance of his
duties hereunder.
7. Complete Agreement
This Agreement represents the complete agreement and
understanding between Vought and Williams pertaining to the
subject matter contained herein, and supersedes all prior
agreements or understandings, written or oral, between the
parties with respect to such subject matter, except, however, the
Stock Appreciation Right Agreement dated as of September 1, 1992
by and between Vought and Williams. No attempted modification or
waiver of any of the provisions hereof shall be binding on either
party unless in writing and signed by both Vought and Williams.
8. Assignment
This Agreement is personal to Williams and shall not be
assigned by him. Vought may assign this Agreement without
Williams' consent to any other entity succeeding to all or
substantially all of the assets or business of Vought, whether by
merger, consolidation, acquisition or otherwise. This Agreement
shall be binding upon Vought, its successors and permitted
assigns, and Williams.
9. Applicable Law
This Agreement shall be construed and enforced in
accordance with the laws of the State of Texas.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement
on October _____, 1993.
GORDON L. WILLIAMS VOUGHT AIRCRAFT COMPANY
__________________________ By:___________________________
J. P. Carr
Senior Vice President -
Administration and Support
EXHIBIT 10(t)
NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION
EXECUTIVE DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN
Plan Design Outline
PLAN PURPOSE:
To provide executives with a capital accumulation opportunity
through deferrals of compensation that is disallowed for tax
deduction under IRS Code Section 162(m)
PLAN YEAR: January 1 to December 31
ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE:
The Compensation and Management Development Committee of the
Board of Directors will administer the Plan
ELIGIBILITY FOR PARTICIPATION:
Selected employees of Northrop Grumman designated by the
Committee
SOURCES OF DEFERRALS:
Compensation that is disallowed for tax deduction under IRS Code
Section 162(m)
DEFERRAL ACCOUNT:
Amounts of compensation deferrals and investment returns thereon
will be credited to a participant's Deferral Account
INTEREST CREDITING RATE:
Interest will be credited to the Account Balance at a rate equal
to 115% of the fourth quarter monthly rate of Moody's Average
Corporate Bond rate for each Plan year
VESTING:
Deferral amounts and investment return credited to Deferral
Account are always 100% vested
Page 2
DISTRIBUTION OF ACCOUNT BALANCES:
In the event of retirement or long-term disability, the normal
form of distribution will be lump sum, 5 or 10 years
In the event of any other termination of employment, the
distribution will be in a single lump sum
RISK OF LOSS:
In the event of the Company's bankruptcy or insolvency, amounts
deferred under the Plan and earnings on these amounts are treated
as Company assets and the rights of Plan Participants would be no
greater than those of general creditors of the Company
PLAN AMENDMENT AND TERMINATION:
Board of Directors may amend or terminate the Plan at any time
but may not reduce benefits
Page 3
NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION
EXECUTIVE DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN
Election Form
I hereby elect to participate in the Northrop Grumman Corporation
Executive Deferred Compensation Plan (the "Plan").
ELECTION TO DEFER COMPENSATION:
____ I hereby irrevocably elect to defer 100% of
compensation that is disallowed for tax
deduction under IRS Code Section 162(m) for
the year 1995.
ELECTION TO RECEIVE BENEFIT AMOUNTS:
I hereby irrevocably elect to receive my distribution from the
Plan in one of the following payment forms. Please check one.
_____ Lump Sum
_____ Annual Installments Of:
_____ 5 years
_____ 10 years
I understand that the Company's obligation to pay benefits under
the Plan will be that of an unfunded and unsecured promise of the
Company to pay benefits in the future, and my rights to benefits
under the Plan will be no greater than those of the Company's
unsecured general creditors.
____________________________________ ______________________
Employee Name (please print or type) Social Security Number
____________________________________ ______________________
Signature Date
EXHIBIT 10(u)
NORTHROP GRUMMAN
TRANSITION PROJECT INCENTIVE PLAN
1. Purpose
The purpose of the Northrop Grumman Transition Project Incentive
Plan (the "Plan") is to impel leadership, decisions and actions of
managers to reduce costs of operations and promote consolidations
and efficiencies with respect to the acquisition of Grumman
Corporation by Northrop Grumman Corporation ("Company").
Accomplishing this purpose while maintaining long-term high
performance and meeting customer requirements will add
significantly to total shareholder value.
2. Term
The Plan shall become effective upon approval by the Northrop
Grumman Board of Directors ("Board") and compensate managers
according to stated provisions for verified cost reductions
attained during the "Plan Measurement Period," defined as the
period between 1 July 1994 and 31 December 1995. This interval
spans the crucial time from commencement of the opportunity for
Northrop Grumman management to affect change in the operations of
Grumman Corporation, to the time by which the purpose of the Plan
must be accomplished. The Plan shall terminate at the close of
business on 1 March 1996. After termination of the Plan, no future
awards may be granted but previously granted awards may be paid if
they are outstanding in accordance with the terms and conditions of
the Plan.
3. Plan Administration
The Compensation and Management Development Committee ("Committee")
of the Board shall be responsible for administration of the Plan.
The Committee shall have full and exclusive power to administer the
plan and to adopt such rules, regulations and guidelines--
consistent with the bylaws of the Corporation--for carrying out the
Plan as it may deem necessary and proper, all of which power shall
be exercised in the best interests of the Company and in keeping
with the objectives of the Plan. This power includes, but is not
limited to, establishing all awards terms and conditions and
adopting Plan modifications, amendments and procedures.
4. Eligibility
Employees in management positions of the Company designated by the
Chief Executive Officer as participants shall be eligible to
receive awards under the Plan. "Employees" shall include persons
on the active payroll of the Company during the term of the Plan
Measurement Period. "Management" shall include any Employee in a
position classification titled manager, director or vice president.
Eligible Managers shall be assigned to one of two groups designated
i) "Senior Executive Group" and ii) "Executive Group." Assignment
to the Senior Executive Group shall be limited to twenty (20)
Managers. Payments of awards under the Plan on a pro rata basis to
participants who, during the Measurement Period, become disabled or
who terminate for any reason--including retirement and resignation-
- -shall be at the sole discretion of the Committee and the Board in
accordance with provisions of Section 5.
5. Awards
Awards under the Plan to elected officers of the Company, including
the Chief Executive Officer, shall be reviewed by the Committee and
submitted for approval to the Board. The Committee shall submit to
the Board its recommendation for award under the Plan to the Chief
Executive Officer. The Board, absent employee directors, shall
determine all such awards to elected officers, including the Chief
Executive Officer. The Committee shall determine awards under the
Plan to each other participant. Recommendations for awards and
justifications under the Plan shall be submitted to the Committee
by the Chief Executive Officer within the term of the Plan. Such
awards will be in cash payment to designated recipients before 31
March 1996, net of tax withholding and other deductions and
adjustments consistent with Company policy and payroll practices.
Awards to all participants may not exceed the amount determined by
calculations defined in Section 7 below. Within this limitation,
individual awards under the Plan may vary at the discretion of the
Committee and the Board.
6. Justification for Awards
Awards under the Plan may be granted by the Committee only for
Verified Cost Savings. "Verified Cost Savings" are dollar value
reductions in Company expense that are reflected in official
financial records of the Company in areas such as, but not limited
to, plant, equipment, real estate, production and overhead costs,
scrap, surplus, inventory, debt and capital cost. The Chief
Executive Office shall only submit to the Committee recommendations
for awards under the Plan that are authenticated and corroborated
by tangible, measured dollar value savings instituted and affected
by Plan participants. Notwithstanding this or such other
justifications or assertions of savings attributed to Plan
participants, the decisions of the Committee and the Board as to
Verified Cost Savings, awards and any other factual matters under
the Plan shall not be subject to review or appeal by participants
or any other persons.
7. Award Schedule
When determined by the Committee, awards under the Plan are paid
according to a schedule establishing a defined fraction of total
cost savings payable. The Awards Schedule is derived by the
following formula: (Savings > $250M) X Percentage to Margin X
Performance Coefficient X Percentage Share, where: i) "Savings >
$250M" equals Verified Cost Savings under the Plan exceeding
$250,000,000, and a value that defines the term "Qualified Cost
Savings;" ii) "Percentage to Margin" equals the percentage of
Qualified Cost Savings for the Measurement Period reflected in the
Company's profit in its official financial records; iii)
"Performance Coefficient" equals a percentage of Qualified Cost
Savings eligible for payment to participants; and iv) "Percent
Share" equals the percentage of the product of i, ii and iii to be
distributed among participants of the Senior Executive Group and
the Executive Group. For purposes of this Plan, Percentage to
Margin shall equal 40%. For Qualified Costs Savings greater than
$250,000,000 and less than $260,000,000, Performance Coefficient
shall equal 10%; for Qualified Costs Savings greater than
$260,000,000 but less than $275,000,000, Performance Coefficient
shall equal 15%; for Qualified Costs Savings greater than
$275,000,000 but less than $300,000,000, Performance Coefficient
shall equal 20%; for Qualified Costs Savings greater than
$300,000,000, Performance Coefficient shall equal 25%; for
Qualified Costs Savings greater than $350,000,000, Performance
Coefficient shall equal 0%. Finally, Percent Share shall equal 40%
for the Senior Executive Group and 60% for the Executive Group.
For illustration, the Appendix contains a graphical representation
of Plan awards at the thresholds of saving defined above for an
assumed number of participants.
8. Adjustments and Reorganizations
In the event the Company undergoes a change in control (as defined
by the Committee), or is not the surviving company in a merger or
consolidation with another company or in the event of a liquidation
or reorganization of the Company during the Term of the Plan, the
Committee may provide for adjustments and settlements of awards as,
and at a time, it deems appropriate.
9. Plan Amendment or Termination
Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan, the Plan may be
amended or terminated by the Committee in its sole and absolute
discretion. Nothing herein creates or shall be deemed to create a
vested right in any participant.
10. Company Benefit Programs
Awards under the Plan shall be deemed a part of a participants
incentive or bonus compensation for purposes of calculating payment
of benefits from any Company benefit plan.
11. Unfunded Plan
Unless otherwise determined by the Committee, the Plan shall be
unfunded and shall not create (or be construed to create) a trust
or separate fund or funds. The Plan shall not establish any
fiduciary relationship between the Company and any participant or
other person.
12. Future Rights
No person shall have any claim or rights to be granted an award
under the Plan, and no participant shall have any rights under the
Plan to be retained in the employ of the Company.
13. Governing Law
The validity, construction and effect of the Plan and any action
taken or relating to the Plan shall be determined in accordance
with the laws of the State of California and applicable Federal
Law.
14. Successors and Assigns
The Plan shall be binding on all successors and assigns of a
participant, including, without limitation, the estate of such
participant and the executor, administrator or trustee of such
estate, or any receiver or trustee in bankruptcy or representative
of a participant's creditors.
APPENDIX
GRAPHIC PRESENTATION OF TRANSITION PROJECT INCENTIVE PLAN AWARDS AT
THE THRESHOLDS OF SAVINGS AS DESCRIBED IN CLAUSE 7 OF THE PLAN.
THE GRAPH ILLUSTRATES EXAMPLES OF AVERAGE INDIVIDUAL PAYOUTS AT
VARYING COST SAVINGS:
GROUP A GROUP B
SAVINGS SENIOR EXECUTIVES EXECUTIVES
(in millions) (in thousands) (in thousands)
Less than 250 0 0
260 8.0 2.4
275 26.0 7.8
300 66.0 19.8
325 116.0 34.8
350 166.0 49.8
EXHIBIT 21
Significant Subsidiaries of Registrant as of December 31, 1994
SIGNIFICANT SUBSIDIARIES: INCORPORATED IN:
Grumman Corporation New York
Grumman Aerospace Corporation New York
Grumman Data Systems Corporation Delaware
Note: The other subsidiaries of the Registrant are not
"significant subsidiaries", as defined by Rule 1.02 of Regulation
S-X, and therefore are not listed herein.
5
YEAR
DEC-31-1994
DEC-31-1994
17
0
1,266
64
1,043
2,431
3,146
1,768
6,047
1,964
1,633
265
25
0
1,025
6,047
6,711
6,711
6,512
6,512
31
0
109
65
30
35
0
0
0
35
.72
.72
EXHIBIT 24
POWER OF ATTORNEY IN CONNECTION WITH THE
1994 ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each of the undersigned
directors and officers of NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION, a
Delaware corporation, does hereby appoint RICHARD R. MOLLEUR and
SHEILA M. GIBBONS, and each of them as his agents and attorneys-
in-fact (the "Agents"), in his respective name and in the
capacity or capacities indicated below to execute and/or file the
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,
1994 (the "Report") under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (the "Act"), and any one or more amendments to any part
of the Report that may be required to be filed under the Act
(including the financial statements, schedules and all exhibits
and other documents filed therewith or constituting a part
thereof) and to any part or all of any amendment(s) to the
Report, whether executed and filed by the undersigned or by any
of the Agents. Further, each of the undersigned does hereby
authorize and direct the Agents to take any and all actions and
execute and file any and all documents with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "Commission"), which they deem necessary
or advisable to comply with the act and the rules and regulations
or orders of the Commission adopted or issued pursuant thereto,
to the end that the Report shall be properly filed under the Act.
Finally, each of the undersigned does hereby ratify each and
every act and documents which the Agents may take, execute or
file pursuant thereto with the same force and effect as though
such action had been taken or such document had been executed or
filed by the undersigned, respectively.
This Power of Attorney shall remain in full force and effect
until revoked or superseded by written notice filed with the
Commission.
IN WITNESS THEREOF, each of the undersigned has subscribed these
presents this
15th day of March, 1995.
__________________________ Chairman of the Board, President
Kent Kresa and Chief Executive Officer and
Director (Principal Executive
Officer)
__________________________ Director
Jack R. Borsting
__________________________ Director
John T. Chain, Jr.
__________________________ Director
Jack Edwards
__________________________ Director
Barbara C. Jordan
__________________________ Director
Aulana L. Peters
__________________________ Director
John E. Robson
__________________________ Director
Richard M. Rosenberg
__________________________ Director
William F. Schmied
__________________________ Director
Brent Scowcroft
__________________________ Director
John Brooks Slaughter
__________________________ Director
Wallace C. Solberg
__________________________ Director
Richard J. Stegemeier
__________________________ Corporate Vice President
Richard B. Waugh, Jr. and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
__________________________ Corporate Vice President
Nelson F. Gibbs and Controller
(Principal Accounting Officer)